Social media decision

Social Fetch

A narrow, small-scale scraper + normalized API for a few platforms is feasible to build and run, but matching Social Fetch's 21-platform coverage, reliability, and scraper upkeep is operationally heavy and costly—so paying is reasonable for full production needs.

Visit website
Subscription$29/month ✓ verified
Initial build80 hours
Monthly upkeep20 hours + $200
Evidence3/3 runs agree

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Social Fetch alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Call heterogeneous platform endpoints, normalize responses into {data,meta}, and bill/consume credits per lookup.

What it still won’t have

  • Coverage and maintenance for 21 platforms and 165 endpoints
  • Engineered reliability (99.8% uptime, hosted throttle handling, and incident tracing)
  • Monitors with signed webhooks and monitor scaling
  • A maintained scraper fleet (DOM-shift fixes, proxy handling, and paid-route accounting)

What remains hard

  • Execution quality99.8% uptime · #3 Product of the Day · 3,200+ developers
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying ischeaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 8 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it

AI build APIs + hosting

Time you would spend

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal hosted Social Fetch replacement in Node.js (Express) + PostgreSQL + Puppeteer (or Playwright) + a paid residential proxy provider. In scope: (1) an API key protected REST endpoint GET /v1/{platform}/profiles/{handle} that performs a live fetch for X, YouTube, and Reddit; (2) normalize responses into {data, meta} with meta.requestId and meta.creditsCharged; (3) implement simple per-call credit accounting (configurable credits-per-route), logging of raw responses, and a /v1/balance and /v1/whoami free route; (4) basic monitor job scheduler that polls a profile and emits signed webhook on diff; (5) retries, proxy rotation, and clear error codes (lookup_failed, not_found, temporarily_unavailable); (6) tests for normalization, auth, and error flows; (7) Dockerfile and a Terraform script to deploy one small VM + managed Postgres. Out of scope: scaling to 21 platforms, a public SDK catalog, paid billing integrations, and legal/compliance review. Include error handling, request tracing IDs, and automated unit/integration tests.
How we checked5 sources · 3/3 runs agreed · evidence score 64

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 5 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • 3/3 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Hard moats found in the evidence-3
  • Evidence score64

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 5

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page✓ 3 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat quoted from the page