Social media decision

Sendible

A capable developer can build a useful social-post scheduler and basic reporting in ~30 hours and host it cheaply, but reproducing Sendible’s breadth of integrations, polished UX, enterprise features, and scale reliability is costly—so build a narrow replacement or keep paying for the full product.

Visit website
You pay

$30/mo

$360/yr

Read off the official pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$50one-off30 h to build

$20/mo8 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 1 seat.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Sendible alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Create and schedule social posts and publish them to connected social profiles on a timetable; basic reporting of post delivery/status.

What it still won’t have

  • Breadth and reliability of dozens of pre-built network integrations
  • White-label dashboard and enterprise account manager
  • Polished UX, onboarding, and support SLAs
  • Advanced features (priority inbox, evergreen recycling, automated branded reports)
  • Scale-tested infrastructure and multi-tenant workspaces

What remains hard

  • Brand trustSee why 30,000 marketers love using Sendible.
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 1 seat.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal self-hosted social scheduling service using Node.js (Express) + Postgres + Redis + a background worker (Bull or BullMQ). Implement: (1) user + workspace + profile models in Postgres, (2) OAuth/connect flow for Facebook/Instagram/LinkedIn/X (storable tokens), (3) composer UI to create per-profile posts and schedule a publish time, (4) background worker to queue and publish posts via each network's HTTP APIs with retry and error logging, (5) a dashboard page showing recent scheduled/published posts and basic success/failure reports. Out of scope: white-labeling, enterprise onboarding, advanced analytics, AI caption generation. Include input validation, token refresh handling, retry/backoff, logging, and unit tests for core flows.
How we checked6 sources · 3/3 runs agreed · evidence score 67

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 6 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • 3/3 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Evidence score67

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 6

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page✓ 3 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat quoted from the page