Image and video decision

Mirage — Detect Image Editing

A capable technical user can reproduce the core detection+undo workflow using open-source forensic and inpainting projects; building a minimal hosted replacement is realistic though it won't match the vendor's native iOS polish or app-store distribution.

View on the App Store
You pay

Not priced

No pricing page we fetched carried a figure, so there is nothing to compare against. The build side is still real.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off80 h to build

$250/mo6 h/mo upkeep

No published price to break even against.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Mirage — Detect Image Editing alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • User uploads a face photo → forensic detector highlights edited regions → inpainting/undo runs to reconstruct pre-edit pixels → UI shows overlay and before/after compare

What it still won’t have

  • Polished native iOS app and App Store distribution
  • In-app purchase/subscription handling and existing paid-user base
  • Certain creative features listed in the store (change hair style, emote images) unless separately implemented
  • Any proprietary model or tuned dataset used by the vendor

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

No published price

Mirage — Detect Image Editing does not publish a price we could read, so there is nothing to compare against. What building costs is below.

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal web service (Python 3.10, Flask or FastAPI, Docker) that accepts an image upload and returns a forensic-edit mask and an inpainted "undo" image. Use GuidoBartoli/sherloq for forensic detection and HuggingFace diffusers for masked inpainting running on a GPU-enabled instance. Core features in scope: image upload + face-present validation, run sherloq to produce per-pixel edit mask and confidence, run diffusers masked inpainting to reconstruct masked regions, web UI with overlay and before/after toggle and download, containerized deployment (Dockerfile) to an AWS/GCP GPU VM. Out of scope: native iOS App Store bundling, paid subscription UI, advanced hairstyle/emote generation. Require robust error handling for invalid files, model failures and timeouts, basic unit/integration tests for upload→process→render flow, and documentation for deploying to a GPU instance.
How we checked3 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 86

How the score was reached

  • Build verdict base78
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 3 cited sources+3
  • Evidence score86

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 3

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded