Image and video decision

Krea

You can self-host core image-generation features because Krea publishes an open-source repo, but the hosted product's value relies on proprietary models and inference infrastructure that are costly and hard to match; build for experimentation or narrow workflows, keep paying for full production scale and enterprise capabilities.

Visit website
Subscription$9/month ✓ verified
Initial build6 hours
Monthly upkeep10 hours + $2000
Evidence1/1 runs agree

What a replacement has to do

  • Provide a web UI to submit text+image prompts, run the open-source Krea model to generate images, store and serve results, and an endpoint for upscaling/LoRA fine-tuning.

What it still won’t have

  • Krea-hosted inference infrastructure and latency/scale optimizations
  • Automatic model updates and access to their proprietary/commercial models and model catalog
  • Enterprise features (SLA, audit logs, user seats, hosted compute packages)
  • Convenience of integrated web app, workflow automation nodes, and managed LoRA training

What remains hard

  • Proprietary modelsPowerful proprietary models
  • Proprietary modelsKrea 2 is our first foundation image model built completely from scratch, focused on aesthetic diversity, style control, and expressive visual direction.
  • Infrastructure at scaleWe put a lot of effort into having one of the strongest inference infrastructures to make models like Flux or Krea-1 to work in just seconds.
  • Infrastructure at scaleIndustry-leading inference speed
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying ischeaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 223 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it

AI build APIs + hosting

Time you would spend

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a self-hosted instance of Krea 2 using the official krea-2 GitHub repo on a single GPU VM. Stack: Ubuntu 22.04, Docker, Docker Compose, Postgres, MinIO (S3-compatible), Nginx, and PyTorch/TensorRT. In scope: clone https://github.com/krea-ai/krea-2, wire environment variables, install model weights, run the model server container on a GPU (NVIDIA drivers + Docker runtime), deploy the backend API, run the web frontend, configure persistence (Postgres + MinIO), implement job queuing, and expose a simple prompt+upload UI. Out of scope: reimplementing model architecture or building multi-region autoscaling. Deliverables must include automated start scripts (docker-compose or k8s manifests), basic unit/integration tests for API endpoints, error handling for model failures and OOMs, and documentation of GPU instance type and monthly cost assumptions.
How we checked4 sources · 1/1 runs agreed · evidence score 99

How the score was reached

  • Self-host verdict base92
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 4 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • 1/1 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Hard moats found in the evidence-6
  • Evidence score99

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time — so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 4

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page✓ 1 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 4 moats quoted from the page