Image and video decision

FaceKit

A competent developer can build a useful self-hosted FaceKit-lite (scanning, metrics, progress tracking) in a few weeks, but reproducing FaceKit's polished mobile UX, device-specific TrueDepth reliability, user base, and community features is expensive and time-consuming.

Visit website
SubscriptionCustom pricing
Initial build46 hours
Monthly upkeep6 hours + $50
Evidence2/3 runs agree

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All FaceKit alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • 1) Capture TrueDepth-style 3D face scan on iOS and stream landmarks; 2) Compute face metrics (symmetry, jawline, posture) from landmarks; 3) Store scans and progress in a backend (Postgres) and expose a JSON API; 4) Mobile UI to show live feedback, guided routines, and a shareable FaceCard export (image/PDF); 5) Simple global leaderboard and comparison endpoint.

What it still won’t have

  • Polished consumer UX, onboarding, and cross-platform app polish
  • Proprietary product analytics and training datasets claimed by FaceKit
  • Apple App Store presence and handling of device-specific edge-cases
  • Community features and moderation for Face Battles and rankings

What remains hard

  • Brand trustTrusted by 120k+ users
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

No published price

FaceKit does not publish a price we could read, so there is nothing to compare against. What building costs is below.

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it

AI build APIs + hosting

Time you would spend

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build an iOS-focused FaceKit-lite using React Native (or SwiftUI) for the client, Node.js + Express backend, and PostgreSQL. Use an on-device face-tracking library (ARKit TrueDepth on iOS or vladmandic/human via WebView as fallback) to capture landmarks; implement metric computations (symmetry, jawline, posture) as reusable functions; expose authenticated REST endpoints for saving scans, retrieving progress, and leaderboards; implement mobile screens for live feedback, guided daily routines, and a shareable FaceCard image/PDF export. Out of scope: training large proprietary ML models, cross-platform Android TrueDepth parity, and community moderation. Include error handling, input validation, unit tests for metric calculations, and end-to-end tests for API flows.
How we checked4 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 60

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 4 cited sources+3
  • Evidence score60

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 4

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat quoted from the page