Image and video decision

Deep Agency

A technical user can build a useful self-hosted replacement using open-source avatar and diffusion projects; no durable moats are evident on the product page, but expect multi-week work and ongoing ops.

Visit website

Built by Danny Postma, who ships 3 products in this index

You pay

Not priced

No pricing page we fetched carried a figure, so there is nothing to compare against. The build side is still real.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off120 h to build

$200/mo6 h/mo upkeep

No published price to break even against.

No open-source build does this yet

Nothing published replaces this one, so a replacement starts from an empty file. Here is what it would have to cover.

What a replacement has to do

  • User submits brief and selects a virtual model → system generates professional photos of the virtual model per brief → user reviews and downloads assets.

What it still won’t have

  • Brand, product polish, and managed UX optimizations
  • Proprietary model fine-tuning and any curated model library maintained by the vendor
  • Ongoing marketing, community reach, and closed-beta support
  • Legal/rights assurances and contract handling provided by the company

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

No published price

Deep Agency does not publish a price we could read, so there is nothing to compare against. What building costs is below.

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal self-hosted virtual-model photo generator using Python (FastAPI) backend, React frontend, PostgreSQL for metadata, and S3-compatible object storage. Core features in scope: (1) brief submission form (style, poses, resolution), (2) server-side generation worker that calls an open-source image model (use Hugging Face Diffusers / local SDXL) plus support for loading LoRA weights, (3) job queue (Redis + RQ) and endpoints to poll status, (4) image storage and signed-download links, (5) web gallery to preview and select final images, (6) simple Stripe checkout for paid downloads, (7) automated email with asset links. Out of scope: training large foundation models, hosted multi-tenant billing, complex rights-management contracts, video-avatar lip-sync. Include input validation, retries for model inference failures, logging, basic unit tests for API endpoints, and containerized deployment (Docker + docker-compose).
How we checked1 sources · 3/3 runs agreed · evidence score 56

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • 3/3 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Evidence score56

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 1

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ 3 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded