Developer tools decision

Whois JSON API

A capable developer can build a usable single/bulk WHOIS+DNS API with caching and auth in about a week, but reproducing the vendor's scale, tiered global caching, accuracy guarantees, and managed SLA is operationally heavy and costly.

Visit website
You pay

$49/mo

$588/yr

Read off the official pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off40 h to build

$50/mo6 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 2 seats.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Whois JSON API alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Accept authenticated REST requests for single or bulk domain lookups; query RDAP/WHOIS registries and DNS resolvers; normalize and cache results; return structured JSON and quota headers.

What it still won’t have

  • Their described "sophisticated tiered caching system to ensure sub-millisecond response times"
  • Operational scale and SLA-grade reliability/priority support for higher tiers
  • Multi-million domain indexing and any proprietary smoothing/normalization optimizations claimed ("99.9%" accuracy)
  • Turnkey hosted quota management and credit-based billing

What remains hard

  • Infrastructure at scaleWe query source registries and maintain a sophisticated tiered caching system to ensure sub-millisecond response times.
  • Brand trustProviding developers with reliable WHOIS data since 2018.
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 2 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a self-hosted domain intelligence REST service (Go + Gin for API, Redis for cache, Postgres for minimal metadata, golang-rdap + system whois calls + miekg/dns resolver). Implement: bearer-token auth and simple key dashboard; GET /v1/{domain} WHOIS/RDAP lookup with normalized JSON; GET /v1/domains?d=... bulk (max 20) with parallel fetches; GET /v1/dns/{domain}?types=... using DNS resolver library; caching layer with 24h TTL and headers X-Requests-Remaining; rate limiter (50 rps global) and request-credit accounting stored in Postgres; robust error handling, retries, timeouts, and unit + integration tests. Out of scope: distributed multi-region cache, paid billing portal, enterprise SLA/priority support. Provide Docker Compose for local dev and a production deploy script for one DigitalOcean droplet + managed Redis.
How we checked4 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 60

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 4 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • Hard moats found in the evidence-3
  • Evidence score60

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 4

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 2 moats quoted from the page