Developer tools decision

SiteHaul

A technical user can reproduce the core functionality (local full-site screenshots and Markdown export) in about a week; SiteHaul's main durable advantage is the polished notarized Mac app and license UX, not hard-to-replicate infrastructure.

Visit website

Built by Dave Ships, who ships 4 products in this index

You pay

Not priced

No pricing page we fetched carried a figure, so there is nothing to compare against. The build side is still real.

You’d pay instead

$50one-off30 h to build

$0/mo1 h/mo upkeep

No published price to break even against.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All SiteHaul alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Crawl a site's sitemap (or accept a list of URLs), render each page in a headless browser at desktop and mobile viewports while forcing lazy-loaded content and clicking cookie banners, capture full-page screenshots and extract page copy to Markdown, save files named from URLs and package into a folder/ZIP.

What it still won’t have

  • Mac App Bundle experience (signed/notarized installer and one-click updates)
  • Polished GUI for selecting pages and unticking sections
  • Built-in license key activation across multiple Macs
  • Marketing, brand, and existing user feedback-driven polish

What remains hard

  • Execution qualityNotarized by Apple. Opens cleanly, no security warnings.
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

No published price

SiteHaul does not publish a price we could read, so there is nothing to compare against. What building costs is below.

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a macOS command-line tool (Node.js + Puppeteer) that: 1) accepts a sitemap URL or a newline list of URLs; 2) discovers and deduplicates page URLs; 3) for each URL renders the page in headless Chromium at desktop (1440x900) and mobile (390x844) viewports and captures full-page PNG screenshots; 4) implements heuristics to click common cookie banners, force lazy-loaded images to load, and freeze animations before capture; 5) extracts visible page copy and saves it as Markdown mapped to the page URL; 6) writes a structured output folder named/organised by URL and produces a ZIP and a contact-sheet gallery; 7) logs progress, retries transient failures, and records any pages flagged by basic login-wall detection; out of scope: macOS notarization, GUI installer, license key handling. Include error handling, unit and integration tests for sitemap parsing, rendering, and file I/O, and a README with usage and install steps.
How we checked4 sources · 3/3 runs agreed · evidence score 93

How the score was reached

  • Build verdict base78
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 4 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • 3/3 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Evidence score93

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 4

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ 3 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat quoted from the page