No-code apps and databases decision

SeaTable Cloud

A small team or skilled engineer can build a useful subset (data grid, Postgres backend, attachments, simple automations) in an open-source stack; full parity (real-time polish, enterprise compliance and integrations) is harder, and SeaTable's EU-hosting compliance is a notable advantage to consider.

Visit website
Subscription$8/month
Initial build80 hours
Monthly upkeep10 hours + $50
Evidence3/3 runs agree

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All SeaTable Cloud alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Provide a web-hosted, collaborative spreadsheet-style database with file attachments, basic relational links, simple scheduled/webhook automations, templates, and a minimal no-code app view layer.

What it still won’t have

  • Polished WYSIWYG no-code app builder and templates library
  • Mature collaborative real-time editing and sync polish
  • Enterprise features and EU-hosting compliance guarantees
  • Prebuilt integrations and SDKs catalog
  • Ongoing product support and managed backups/uptime SLAs

What remains hard

  • Compliance and regulationIhre Daten werden ausschließlich in der EU gehostet, um höchste Datenschutzstandards zu gewährleisten.
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying ischeaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 8 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it

AI build APIs + hosting

Time you would spend

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal SeaTable-like cloud app using Postgres, Node (Express or FastAPI), React, and S3-compatible storage. Implement: 1) a spreadsheet-style grid UI with basic views (table, gallery, kanban, calendar); 2) relational storage in Postgres with attachments stored in S3; 3) user auth, org/workspace model, and shareable links; 4) an automation runner supporting scheduled (cron) tasks and webhook triggers with a simple rule editor; 5) REST API for all operations and a basic template import/export. Out of scope: real-time collaborative cell-level editing, full template marketplace, enterprise-grade compliance certification, and advanced AI features. Include input validation, error handling, logging, Docker-based deployment, a basic CI test suite (unit + integration), and deployment scripts for a single VPS or small cloud instance.
How we checked3 sources · 3/3 runs agreed · evidence score 61

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 3 cited sources+3
  • 3/3 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Hard moats found in the evidence-3
  • Evidence score61

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 3

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

! Price not confirmed on the page - this pricing page renders its price in the browser✓ 3 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat quoted from the page