No-code apps and databases decision

Neon

You can self-host Neon: the upstream neon repo is public, so a technical user can stand it up instead of paying, though expect multi-week setup and ongoing ops to reproduce Neon's autoscaling, branching, and managed primitives.

Visit website
Subscription$15/month ✓ verified
Initial build6 hours
Monthly upkeep30 hours + $300
Evidence1/1 runs agree

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Neon alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Provide a branchable, autoscaling Postgres backend plus bundled backend primitives (auth, S3-compatible object storage, functions runner, and an AI gateway) that developers can create projects against.

What it still won’t have

  • Neon's production autoscaling and CU-hour billing plumbing
  • Copy-on-write branching and instant restore storage optimizations
  • Integrated Managed Better Auth maintained and one-click install
  • Multi-AZ storage, HA, and SLA guarantees
  • Built-in AI Gateway, Functions, and S3-compatible branching storage as managed services

What remains hard

  • Infrastructure at scaleServerless database that scales and branches with your app.
  • Brand trustNeon was founded by Postgres committers, bringing decades of expertise.
  • Brand trustNeon has been part of the Databricks Platform since May 2025.
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying ischeaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 21 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it

AI build APIs + hosting

Time you would spend

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a self-hosted Neon stack on AWS using Docker/Kubernetes: deploy the neondatabase/neon repo, configure Postgres storage on multi-AZ S3-backed volumes, run compute endpoints behind an autoscaler (Kubernetes HPA or AWS Autoscaling Groups) that can scale to zero, enable copy-on-write branching backed by snapshot storage, deploy an S3-compatible object store (MinIO) configured to branch storage snapshots, deploy a functions runner (Node.js container) that can be deployed per-branch, and provide a small admin web UI (Next.js) and REST API to create projects/branches and to route auth and object storage to the correct branch. In scope: automated deploy scripts (Terraform), CI for builds, Prometheus+Grafana metrics, backup/restore, and integration tests that exercise branching and scale-to-zero. Out of scope: reimplementing the Neon control plane features not present in upstream repo, training models for AI Gateway, and commercial SLA/legal work. Include error handling, health checks, and unit/integration tests for branching, autoscaling, auth integration, and object storage operations.
How we checked5 sources · 1/1 runs agreed · evidence score 99

How the score was reached

  • Self-host verdict base92
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 5 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • 1/1 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Hard moats found in the evidence-3
  • Evidence score99

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 5

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page✓ 1 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 3 moats quoted from the page