No-code apps and databases decision

Neon

You can self-host Neon: the upstream neon repo is public, so a technical user can stand it up instead of paying, though expect multi-week setup and ongoing ops to reproduce Neon's autoscaling, branching, and managed primitives.

Visit website
You pay

$15/mo

$180/yr

Read off the official pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$20one-off6 h to build

$300/mo30 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 21 seats.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Neon alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Provide a branchable, autoscaling Postgres backend plus bundled backend primitives (auth, S3-compatible object storage, functions runner, and an AI gateway) that developers can create projects against.

What it still won’t have

  • Neon's production autoscaling and CU-hour billing plumbing
  • Copy-on-write branching and instant restore storage optimizations
  • Integrated Managed Better Auth maintained and one-click install
  • Multi-AZ storage, HA, and SLA guarantees
  • Built-in AI Gateway, Functions, and S3-compatible branching storage as managed services

What remains hard

  • Infrastructure at scaleServerless database that scales and branches with your app.
  • Brand trustNeon was founded by Postgres committers, bringing decades of expertise.
  • Brand trustNeon has been part of the Databricks Platform since May 2025.
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 21 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a self-hosted Neon stack on AWS using Docker/Kubernetes: deploy the neondatabase/neon repo, configure Postgres storage on multi-AZ S3-backed volumes, run compute endpoints behind an autoscaler (Kubernetes HPA or AWS Autoscaling Groups) that can scale to zero, enable copy-on-write branching backed by snapshot storage, deploy an S3-compatible object store (MinIO) configured to branch storage snapshots, deploy a functions runner (Node.js container) that can be deployed per-branch, and provide a small admin web UI (Next.js) and REST API to create projects/branches and to route auth and object storage to the correct branch. In scope: automated deploy scripts (Terraform), CI for builds, Prometheus+Grafana metrics, backup/restore, and integration tests that exercise branching and scale-to-zero. Out of scope: reimplementing the Neon control plane features not present in upstream repo, training models for AI Gateway, and commercial SLA/legal work. Include error handling, health checks, and unit/integration tests for branching, autoscaling, auth integration, and object storage operations.
How we checked5 sources · 1/1 runs agreed · evidence score 99

How the score was reached

  • Self-host verdict base92
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 5 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • 1/1 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Hard moats found in the evidence-3
  • Evidence score99

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 5

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page✓ 1 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 3 moats quoted from the page