SEO and marketing decision

Screaming Frog SEO Spider

A competent technical user can build a useful subset (crawler + JS rendering + basic SEO checks and exports) in about a week; keep paying for Screaming Frog if you need their polished GUI, integrations, scale, and vendor support.

Visit website
You pay

$20.42/mo

$245/yr

Per seat. Read off the official pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$50one-off30 h to build

$0/mo4 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 1 seat.

No open-source build does this yet

Nothing published replaces this one, so a replacement starts from an empty file. Here is what it would have to cover.

What a replacement has to do

  • Crawl a target site, render pages (execute JS), extract key SEO fields (status, titles, metas, links), detect errors/broken links/redirects, and export reports.

What it still won’t have

  • Polish and desktop GUI of the official app (native installers and menus)
  • Built-in integrations (Google Analytics, Search Console, PageSpeed Insights)
  • Advanced features: near-duplicate detection with vector embeddings, Looker Studio crawl report, and Log File Analyser bundle
  • Brand trust, support, and yearly licence convenience

What remains hard

  • Brand trust
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 1 seat.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a self-hosted SEO site crawler using Python (Scrapy for requests + Playwright for JS rendering), store results in SQLite, and expose a simple FastAPI web UI. In scope: crawl a site respecting robots.txt, render pages, extract status code, titles, meta descriptions, H1/H2, internal/external links, detect broken links and redirect chains, export CSV and XML sitemap, provide a CLI to run/schedule crawls, and include error handling and unit/integration tests. Out of scope: vector embeddings for near-duplicate detection, Looker Studio/GA/GSC/PSI integrations, advanced visual site graphs, and paid licence management.
How we checked3 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 84

How the score was reached

  • Build verdict base78
  • 3 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • Evidence score84

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 3

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded