SEO and marketing decision

Phantom

A competent developer can reproduce the core Chrome-extension audit and CSV export in ~28 hours and maintain it cheaply; the vendor's value-adds are product polish, paid-tier limits, and support rather than irreproducible moats.

Visit website
You pay

Not priced

No pricing page we fetched carried a figure, so there is nothing to compare against. The build side is still real.

You’d pay instead

$50one-off28 h to build

$0/mo1 h/mo upkeep

No published price to break even against.

No open-source build does this yet

Nothing published replaces this one, so a replacement starts from an empty file. Here is what it would have to cover.

What a replacement has to do

  • Navigate to a Google Business Profile in Search or Maps, scrape profile fields (categories, reviews, photos, ratings), compute audit metrics (velocity/frequency), and export results as CSV or save an audit.

What it still won’t have

  • Chrome Web Store hosting/visibility and established extension listing
  • Polish and UX of existing product UI and charts
  • Built-in credit/plan enforcement (monthly credits) and paid-tier features
  • Priority support and a dedicated account manager (available on Advanced tier)

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

No published price

Phantom does not publish a price we could read, so there is nothing to compare against. What building costs is below.

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a Chrome extension using TypeScript, React (for the popup UI), and Manifest V3 that audits Google Business Profiles on Google Search and Maps. In scope: content scripts that detect and scrape GMB fields (business name, primary/secondary categories, review counts/ratings, photos), client-side parsers that compute metrics (review velocity, photo upload frequency), a popup UI showing the metrics and simple charts, CSV export of scraped data, and local persistence of saved audits (localStorage). Out of scope: payments integration, multi-user hosted SaaS features, and an account billing system. Include error handling for DOM changes, unit tests for parsers, and end-to-end tests for the extension workflow.
How we checked2 sources · 3/3 runs agreed · evidence score 83

How the score was reached

  • Build verdict base78
  • 2 cited sources+1
  • 3/3 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Evidence score83

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 2

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ 3 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded