CRM and sales decision

Followup CRM

A competent technical user can build a useful construction CRM replacement (contacts, bids, pipeline, email capture, proposals) in a few weeks and run it; complete enterprise polish, SSO, and vendor onboarding are the main things you give up.

Visit website
You pay

$99/mo

$1,188/yr

Per seat. Read off the official pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off56 h to build

$150/mo6 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 2 seats.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Followup CRM alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Capture leads and contacts, log bids/opportunities, move deals through a pipeline, send/track follow-up emails, and view simple dashboards/reporting.

What it still won’t have

  • Guided onboarding, paid data migration & team training offered by vendor
  • Enterprise features out of the box (SSO, multi-entity reporting, enterprise SSO)
  • Vendor support, SLAs, and 30-day money-back guarantee
  • Polished integrations and any proprietary AI/voice features not reimplemented

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 2 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a self-hosted construction CRM using Laravel + Postgres and a React front end. Implement: user auth and role-based access (per-seat metadata), contacts/companies/leads/bids schema, pipeline UI to move deals across configurable stages, inbound email capture via IMAP (link messages to contacts/opportunities), a simple templated proposal-to-PDF generator, and dashboard aggregations (pipeline by stage, close rate, bid counts). Out of scope: multi-entity SaaS billing, enterprise SSO, and large-scale multi-tenant isolation. Include error handling, input validation, CI tests for API endpoints, and Docker deployment manifests for a single VPS.
How we checked5 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 63

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 5 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • Evidence score63

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 5

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded