Developer tools decision

DevSuite

A single competent developer can build and maintain a usable curated tools directory replacement in about a week; the main value you'd lose is DevSuite's existing audience and affiliate relationships, not hard technical capabilities.

Visit website

Built by Piotr Kulpinski, who ships 4 products in this index

You pay

Not priced

No pricing page we fetched carried a figure, so there is nothing to compare against. The build side is still real.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off36 h to build

$10/mo3 h/mo upkeep

No published price to break even against.

No open-source build does this yet

Nothing published replaces this one, so a replacement starts from an empty file. Here is what it would have to cover.

What a replacement has to do

  • Provide a searchable catalog of developer tools with categories, individual tool pages, submit form, and newsletter signup.

What it still won’t have

  • brand-trust and audience (DevSuite's newsletter and established readership)
  • existing affiliate relationships and referral revenue
  • curation and editorial selection that took time to build
  • index breadth and third-party listings already aggregated

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

No published price

DevSuite does not publish a price we could read, so there is nothing to compare against. What building costs is below.

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a searchable developer-tools directory as a Next.js (React) app with a Postgres database (Supabase as optional hosted), server-side rendered category and tool pages, an admin UI (NextAuth for auth) to add/edit listings, a public submit form with moderation queue, full-text search via Postgres pg_trgm or Meilisearch, scheduled job to validate outbound links, Mailgun/SendGrid integration for newsletter signups, and deployment to Vercel or Render. In scope: import CSV of initial listings, category/tag filters, single-seat admin, affiliate link storage, basic pageview analytics. Out of scope: multi-tenant workspaces, complex recommendation engine, paid subscription management. Include error handling, input validation, unit tests for backend routes, and end-to-end tests for critical UI flows.
How we checked3 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 81

How the score was reached

  • Build verdict base78
  • 3 cited sources+3
  • Evidence score81

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 3

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded