No-code apps and databases decision

Convex

A technical user can reproduce a narrow Convex-like stack (DB + realtime sync + function runner) with open components, but fully matching Convex’s managed scaling, type-safety tooling, components library, and enterprise features is a larger engineering effort best justified only if you need to avoid the hosted product long-term.

Visit website
Subscription$25/month ✓ verified
Initial build80 hours
Monthly upkeep12 hours + $100
Evidence3/3 runs agree

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need — the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship.

Code Convex publishes itself

Not a way out of the subscription — these are the vendor’s own repositories. Worth a look for how they build, and for anything you would have to integrate with.

What a replacement has to do

  • Provide a reactive/real-time backend with an ACID-capable datastore, server-side functions/actions, realtime sync to clients, auth, and basic file/search storage.

What it still won’t have

  • Managed automatic caching & scaling
  • End-to-end TypeScript type-safety across client and backend
  • Convex Components library (sandboxed, modular TypeScript building blocks)
  • Built-in workpool/workflow primitives with retries and checkpointing
  • Enterprise compliance attestations and managed SOC2/HIPAA support

What remains hard

  • Infrastructure at scaleAutomatic caching & scaling so going viral never takes you down
  • Execution qualityAll TypeScript, zero glue.
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying ischeaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 5 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it

AI build APIs + hosting

Time you would spend

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal self-hosted Convex-like backend using Postgres, Node.js, and a lightweight WebSocket sync server. Include: (1) Postgres schema with transactional helpers and a changefeed layer (LISTEN/NOTIFY) to publish row changes; (2) a Node.js serverless-style action runner (Express/Koa with job queue) supporting retries and exponential backoff; (3) a WebSocket gateway that subscribes to changefeeds and pushes real-time updates to authenticated clients; (4) OAuth-based auth and session management; (5) S3-compatible file storage with signed URLs; (6) a basic full-text search index (e.g., Postgres tsvector or external search) and a simple vector store integration. Out of scope: building a TypeScript end-to-end codegen system, enterprise SLAs, multi-region managed scaling, or SOC2/HIPAA certification. Provide error handling, retries, logging, and automated tests for core flows (transactions, function execution, realtime delivery, auth).
How we checked4 sources · 3/3 runs agreed · evidence score 64

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 4 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • 3/3 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Hard moats found in the evidence-3
  • Evidence score64

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time — so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 4

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page✓ 3 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 2 moats quoted from the page