No-code apps and databases decision

Convex

A technical user can reproduce a narrow Convex-like stack (DB + realtime sync + function runner) with open components, but fully matching Convex’s managed scaling, type-safety tooling, components library, and enterprise features is a larger engineering effort best justified only if you need to avoid the hosted product long-term.

Visit website
You pay

$25/mo

$300/yr

Per seat. Read off the official pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off80 h to build

$100/mo12 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 5 seats.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Convex alternatives, with the arithmetic →

Code Convex publishes itself

Not a way out of the subscription - these are the vendor’s own repositories. Worth a look for how they build, and for anything you would have to integrate with.

What a replacement has to do

  • Provide a reactive/real-time backend with an ACID-capable datastore, server-side functions/actions, realtime sync to clients, auth, and basic file/search storage.

What it still won’t have

  • Managed automatic caching & scaling
  • End-to-end TypeScript type-safety across client and backend
  • Convex Components library (sandboxed, modular TypeScript building blocks)
  • Built-in workpool/workflow primitives with retries and checkpointing
  • Enterprise compliance attestations and managed SOC2/HIPAA support

What remains hard

  • Infrastructure at scaleAutomatic caching & scaling so going viral never takes you down
  • Execution qualityAll TypeScript, zero glue.
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 5 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal self-hosted Convex-like backend using Postgres, Node.js, and a lightweight WebSocket sync server. Include: (1) Postgres schema with transactional helpers and a changefeed layer (LISTEN/NOTIFY) to publish row changes; (2) a Node.js serverless-style action runner (Express/Koa with job queue) supporting retries and exponential backoff; (3) a WebSocket gateway that subscribes to changefeeds and pushes real-time updates to authenticated clients; (4) OAuth-based auth and session management; (5) S3-compatible file storage with signed URLs; (6) a basic full-text search index (e.g., Postgres tsvector or external search) and a simple vector store integration. Out of scope: building a TypeScript end-to-end codegen system, enterprise SLAs, multi-region managed scaling, or SOC2/HIPAA certification. Provide error handling, retries, logging, and automated tests for core flows (transactions, function execution, realtime delivery, auth).
How we checked4 sources · 3/3 runs agreed · evidence score 64

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 4 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • 3/3 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Hard moats found in the evidence-3
  • Evidence score64

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 4

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page✓ 3 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 2 moats quoted from the page