No-code apps and databases decision

Bolt.new

A capable developer can build a narrow AI-to-static-app workflow (prompt → generated repo → deploy) in ~30 hours using OpenAI, Supabase and Vercel; reproducing Bolt’s enterprise hosting, token-routing agents, team features and integrated design-system at scale is much harder, so keeping Bolt may be warranted for full product needs.

Visit website
You pay

$25/mo

$300/yr

Read off the official pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$50one-off30 h to build

$150/mo6 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 7 seats.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Bolt.new alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • User prompts → AI generates project files (frontend + backend stubs) → deploy to hosting; plus basic auth and database wiring.

What it still won’t have

  • Enterprise-grade Bolt Cloud hosting, analytics and built-in infra
  • Bolt’s claimed token-routing and agent orchestration
  • Integrated design-system & visual Plan mode
  • Team management, SSO, audit logs and enterprise support
  • Unlimited built-in databases and UI for DB management

What remains hard

  • Brand trustTrusted by Google, Microsoft, Salesforce, AWS, Meta, HubSpot, Accenture, TikTok, Shopify, Chegg, Cloudflare, Netlify, FactSet, ByteDance, PwC, Mozilla, Intel, Xano, Stripe
  • Infrastructure at scaleBolt Cloud gives you enterprise-grade backend infrastructure including hosting, databases, integrations and more.
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 7 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal AI-first website/app builder using Next.js (TypeScript), React, Tailwind CSS, Node backend (Express) and a Supabase database. Core features in scope: 1) simple chat UI that accepts a project prompt and basic settings; 2) call OpenAI to generate project files (React app skeleton + package.json + simple API route); 3) store generated files in a Git repo (use GitHub API) or object store; 4) trigger automated build & deploy to Vercel/Netlify via their API and return a preview URL; 5) wire a Supabase DB and simple email/password auth scaffold into generated app; 6) show file browser and logs, and run a lint/test step before deploy. Out of scope: multi-user billing/teams, enterprise SSO/audit logs, custom agent orchestration, visual Plan mode, image-editing UIs. Include error handling for LLM failures, rate limits, and deployment errors; include automated tests for generation → build → deploy flow and README with setup steps and env var list.
How we checked5 sources · 3/3 runs agreed · evidence score 64

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 5 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • 3/3 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Hard moats found in the evidence-3
  • Evidence score64

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 5

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page✓ 3 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 2 moats quoted from the page