AI assistants and search decision

TrueSearch

A technical user can reproduce a useful people-search workflow by wiring search APIs, extraction, and a simple UI (prior art like aleph helps), but matching the vendor's mobile polish, App Store billing, and any proprietary data sources is unlikely without ongoing costs.

View on the App Store
You pay

$2.5/mo

$30/yr

Read off the official pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off80 h to build

$50/mo6 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 24 seats.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All TrueSearch alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Enter a name/username/email/phone → query public web/single-sign search APIs → extract public profiles/links/mentions → present aggregated results in a clean view.

What it still won’t have

  • Access to any proprietary data sources or commercial people-data partnerships the app may use
  • Polished native mobile UX and App Store distribution/management
  • Any internal ranking/tuning or dataset curation the vendor maintains
  • Built-in subscription/billing UX and analytics the App Store provides

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 24 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a self-hosted web application (Node.js + Express backend, Postgres database, React frontend) that accepts name/username/email/phone searches, queries one configurable web-search API (e.g., Bing Web Search or SerpAPI) and fetches result pages, parses and extracts public profile links/usernames/mentions, stores cached results in Postgres, and displays aggregated profiles and a short open-web summary. Out of scope: face/photo reverse search, paid/proprietary data broker integrations, mobile native app packaging. Include error handling for API failures and rate limits, basic auth for a single admin user, automated tests for parsing and API integrations, and deployment scripts (Dockerfile + docker-compose).
How we checked2 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 61

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 2 cited sources+1
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • Evidence score61

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 2

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded