SEO and marketing decision

Timetopost.co

A technical user can reimplement the core visibility loop (keyword research, rank checks, article generation, and X scheduling) using available OSS components, but reproducing the full 19-tool polished product, MCP agent integrations, and production reliability is non-trivial and likely more effort than a single developer should absorb for parity.

Visit website
You pay

$12/mo

$144/yr

Read off the official pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off66 h to build

$150/mo6 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 14 seats.

No open-source build does this yet

Nothing published replaces this one, so a replacement starts from an empty file. Here is what it would have to cover.

What a replacement has to do

  • Collect keyword opportunities, track rankings, generate an article with an LLM, publish the article to your site (WordPress/Git/webhook), and schedule X posts with an approval queue.

What it still won’t have

  • the polish and UX of a unified 19-tool workspace
  • built-in MCP agent integrations and Autopilot workflows
  • reliable multi-channel publishing roadmap and existing provider relationships
  • production-grade scaling, analytics, and uptime guarantees

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 14 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal TimeToPost replacement as a Dockerized web app (React frontend + Node/Express backend + Postgres). Implement: 1) a keyword research UI that queries a self-hosted SERP scraper (use karust/openserp) and stores opportunities; 2) a rank-tracking scheduler (cron worker) that checks SERP and saves history in Postgres; 3) an article-generation endpoint that calls an LLM provider (configurable) to produce outlines and drafts with basic image support; 4) AutoSEO publishing connectors: WordPress REST and Git PR webhook to push drafts; 5) X scheduling UI with an approval queue and presigned media uploads. Out of scope: multi-network publish rollout, backlink outreach CRM, and advanced AI-mention model monitoring. Include error handling, auth, DB migrations, basic unit tests for API routes, and deployment manifests (Docker Compose).
How we checked2 sources · 3/3 runs agreed · evidence score 60

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • 2 cited sources+1
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • 3/3 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Evidence score60

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 2

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page✓ 3 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded