Uncategorised decision

The Next AI Directory

A minimal, useful replacement (searchable directory + submissions) is realistic for one developer to build and run in about a week, but the full product value (audience, manual curation, and brand) is not reproduced.

Visit website

Built by Ozgur Ozer, who ships 12 products in this index

You pay

Not priced

No pricing page we fetched carried a figure, so there is nothing to compare against. The build side is still real.

You’d pay instead

$50one-off24 h to build

$20/mo3 h/mo upkeep

No published price to break even against.

No open-source build does this yet

Nothing published replaces this one, so a replacement starts from an empty file. Here is what it would have to cover.

What a replacement has to do

  • Crawl or ingest AI-directory listings, store metadata, expose searchable listings, accept submissions, and provide an admin verification UI.

What it still won’t have

  • Brand recognition and existing audience
  • Any manual curation and editorial vetting processes the site currently applies
  • Potential integrations, analytics, or paid features not replicated

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

No published price

The Next AI Directory does not publish a price we could read, so there is nothing to compare against. What building costs is below.

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a lightweight AI-directory web app using PostgreSQL, Node.js (Express or Fastify) for the API, and React for the frontend. In scope: (1) a scraper/importer that fetches a seed list and normalizes name, URL, short description, and popularity metric; (2) a Postgres schema and migrations; (3) REST endpoints for listing, search (text + tag filters), pagination, and a submission endpoint; (4) React listing page with search, filters and pagination, a submission form, and a simple admin UI to approve/reject submissions; (5) a scheduled worker (cron) that re-checks remote URLs and flags dead links. Out of scope: user accounts beyond a single admin, advanced ranking algorithms, paid tiers, analytics dashboards, and a mobile app. Include error handling, input validation, unit tests for API routes, and deployment scripts (Docker + single-node VPS).
How we checked1 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 52

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • Evidence score52

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 1

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded