AI assistants and search decision

Tana

A focused meeting notetaker that records, transcribes, and generates summaries/action items is realistic for a small team to build and run; reproducing Tana’s full product (native in-call agents, broad MCP integrations, enterprise compliance, and orchestration) is larger and better served by the hosted product.

Visit website
You pay

$20/mo

$240/yr

Per seat. Read off the official pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$50one-off30 h to build

$70/mo6 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 4 seats.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Tana alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Record meeting audio, transcribe it, extract/summarize decisions and action items, store items in a simple searchable graph, and surface/send follow-ups.

What it still won’t have

  • Native in-call agent automation that acts during the video call
  • Deep, supported integrations (MCP/API-first ecosystem) and turnkey connectors
  • Enterprise security, compliance, and dedicated support (SOC2/HIPAA claims)
  • Multi-agent orchestration, skills, and the full knowledge-graph UX

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 4 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal agentic meeting notetaker as a web app using: React frontend, Node.js/Express backend, PostgreSQL, and Docker. Implement: (1) browser audio recording + upload endpoint; (2) async transcription via a speech-to-text API (e.g., Whisper/AssemblyAI) with timestamps; (3) LLM-based post-processing step to produce meeting summary, decisions, and action items (use OpenAI/GPT or other LLM API); (4) Postgres schema for meetings, participants, items, and a simple REST search endpoint; (5) outbound follow-up sender (SMTP) and optional Google Calendar task creation. Out of scope: building a full video conferencing client, multi-tenant enterprise SSO/SAML, SOC2/HIPAA attestation, and a marketplace of integrations. Include error handling, request retries, input validation, and automated tests for transcription processing and item extraction. Provide Docker compose for local dev and deployment notes for a single small VPS.
How we checked5 sources · 3/3 runs agreed · evidence score 67

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 5 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • 3/3 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Evidence score67

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 5

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page✓ 3 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded