CRM and sales decision

Subsignal

A lean Reddit-monitoring lead tool is realistic for a single technical user to build and operate, but the full commercial product (polish, integrations, scale, support) is not replaced by this minimal implementation.

Visit website

Built by Patrick Gerard, who ships 6 products in this index

You pay

Not priced

No pricing page we fetched carried a figure, so there is nothing to compare against. The build side is still real.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off40 h to build

$0/mo3 h/mo upkeep

No published price to break even against.

No open-source build does this yet

Nothing published replaces this one, so a replacement starts from an empty file. Here is what it would have to cover.

What a replacement has to do

  • Poll Reddit for matching posts/comments → extract contact/lead signals → store and deduplicate leads → notify via webhook/email and present simple lead list UI

What it still won’t have

  • Polished UX and product polish
  • Proprietary integrations and onboarding flows
  • Commercial support and SLA
  • Scale and reliability guarantees
  • Any paid features not discoverable from the page (advanced analytics, enrichment, model-based scoring)

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

No published price

Subsignal does not publish a price we could read, so there is nothing to compare against. What building costs is below.

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal Reddit-based lead-monitoring service using Python (FastAPI), Postgres, and a simple React admin UI. Core features in scope: 1) scheduled Reddit polling worker using Pushshift/Reddit API configurable by keywords and subreddits, 2) parsers to extract username, post URL, timestamp, and text, 3) deduplication and scoring heuristics stored in Postgres, 4) webhook and transactional email notifications via SendGrid, 5) a React UI to list, filter, and mark leads, 6) background scheduler (e.g., Celery or APScheduler), logging, and basic auth. Out of scope: advanced ML-based enrichment, multi-tenant billing, enterprise integrations, and mobile apps. Include error handling, retries, automated tests for core endpoints/workers, and a README with deployment (Docker Compose) and run instructions.
How we checked1 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 52

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • Evidence score52

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 1

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded