Design and diagrams decision

SimpleMind

A competent developer can build a useful web-based mind-mapper (core edit/export/search) in a few weeks, but replicating the cross-platform native apps, years of polish, packaging, and official support that SimpleMind provides is non-trivial.

Visit website
You pay

Not priced

No pricing page we fetched carried a figure, so there is nothing to compare against. The build side is still real.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off80 h to build

$0/mo6 h/mo upkeep

No published price to break even against.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All SimpleMind alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Create and edit a mind map (nodes, links, styles), persist maps to files, export as PDF/PNG/HTML, and open existing maps.

What it still won’t have

  • Native per-platform packaged apps (Mac, Windows, iOS, Android) and their installers
  • Years of product polish and continuous UX improvements
  • In-app purchase infrastructure used by the official Pro edition
  • Official support, video tutorials and documentation provided on the product site

What remains hard

  • Execution qualityTrustworthy and reliable: 17+ years of updates and improvements.
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

No published price

SimpleMind does not publish a price we could read, so there is nothing to compare against. What building costs is below.

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a web-based mind-mapping app using React for the frontend, Electron (optional) for desktop packaging, Node.js + Express for optional sync endpoints, and PostgreSQL or file-based storage. In scope: interactive canvas with draggable nodes, basic auto-layout (radial/vertical), node metadata (notes, images, checkboxes), save/load maps as JSON files, export to PDF and PNG, search and collapse/expand branches, and optional Dropbox sync using a user-provided OAuth token. Out of scope: mobile native apps (iOS/Android), in-app purchase flows, and proprietary visual themes. Include input validation, error handling, unit tests for core logic (layout, serialization, export) and end-to-end tests for the editor flow.
How we checked5 sources · 3/3 runs agreed · evidence score 64

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 5 cited sources+3
  • 3/3 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Evidence score64

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 5

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ 3 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat quoted from the page