Health, home and travel decision

Shotwise

A competent developer can build and maintain a practical Shotwise replacement in ~40 hours using native iOS tooling; the product has no durable moats in the supplied pages so self-build is realistic.

View on the App Store
You pay

$0.42/mo

$5/yr

Read off the official pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off40 h to build

$0/mo3 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 20 seats.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Shotwise alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Log injections and dose → schedule local reminders → record weight → view combined history and charts

What it still won’t have

  • App Store distribution and existing user base
  • Polish and bug fixes accumulated in the production app
  • Developer support and warranty for App Store payments/subscriptions

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 20 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal iOS (SwiftUI) GLP‑1 shot and weight tracker backed by CoreData and optional HealthKit sync. Scope: screens to add/edit injections (medication, dose, injection site, timestamp), weight entry screen, list/history, line chart overlaying weight with injection events, configurable local notifications/reminders, App Store receipt validation to gate premium features, CSV export, and basic settings. Out of scope: server backend, analytics, multi-user accounts. Include unit tests for data model logic, UI tests for core flows, error handling for failed saves/notification scheduling, and build/run instructions.
How we checked3 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 89

How the score was reached

  • Build verdict base78
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 3 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • Evidence score89

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 3

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded