AI assistants and search decision

SHANNON LAB LLC

Keep paying — Shannon's proprietary models, curated adversarial benchmark (DarkEval), and compliance posture are durable advantages that a solo developer cannot realistically replicate.

Visit website
Subscription$5.99/month ✓ verified
Initial build30 hours
Monthly upkeep8 hours + $100
Evidence2/3 runs agree

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need — the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship.

What a replacement has to do

  • Provide a chat UI that proxies user messages to an LLM API, store short-term memory, surface web-search citations, and support function-calling/tool hooks for agentic workflows.

What it still won’t have

  • Shannon 2 proprietary model and performance
  • DarkEval proprietary adversarial benchmark and exploit coverage
  • Enterprise compliance guarantees (SOC 2 Type II, custom compliance mapping)
  • Built-in web search with integrated source citations and their token-quota model
  • Any gated access to constraints-relaxed red-team models and audit tooling

What remains hard

  • Proprietary modelsOur new flagship, built on the Kimi K2.7 trillion-parameter foundation — frontier-distilled on 30K curated reasoning examples and served in FP8 for professional red-team and security work.
  • Proprietary dataPost-trained on 30,000 curated frontier-grade reasoning and instruction examples for sharper, more reliable answers.
  • Compliance and regulationWe're SOC 2 Type II compliant.
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying ischeaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 18 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it

AI build APIs + hosting

Time you would spend

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal Shannon-like chat+API service using Next.js for the frontend, Node/Express (or Next API) backend, Postgres for memory, Redis for rate-limits/queues, and the OpenAI API (or a hosted open-model) as the LLM. Scope in-scope: streaming chat UI, authenticated API key proxy, token accounting, persistent short-term memory (lookup + store), web-search integration (call a search API and attach top-3 citations), basic function-calling adapter to invoke HTTP tools, and server-side logging. Out of scope: reimplementing Shannon proprietary models, DarkEval benchmark, enterprise SOC2 attestation, and a multi-tenant billing portal. Include error handling, retries, unit tests for API adapters, and end-to-end test for the chat flow.
How we checked5 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 22

How the score was reached

  • Pay verdict base20
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 5 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • Hard moats found in the evidence-9
  • Evidence score22

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time — so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 5

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 3 moats quoted from the page