SEO and marketing decision

Serpstat

A small team can build a useful subset (keyword research, basic rank tracking, site audits) but cannot cheaply reproduce Serpstat's proprietary, large-scale dataset and polished product experience — keep paying for full coverage or build a narrow internal tool.

Visit website
Subscription$69/month
Initial build80 hours
Monthly upkeep20 hours + $300
Evidence2/3 runs agree

No open-source build does this yet

Nothing published replaces this one, so a replacement starts from an empty file. Here is what it would have to cover.

What a replacement has to do

  • Crawl or fetch SERPs and keyword volumes, store and index keywords/domains, run scheduled rank checks, run on-page/site audit crawls, expose results via a small web UI and simple JSON API

What it still won’t have

  • Breadth and freshness of proprietary index and coverage
  • Scale and historical dataset depth (billions of keywords/backlinks)
  • Polished integrations, white-label reporting, and team features
  • Browser extension and other convenience tools
  • Enterprise support, training, and SLA-backed API

What remains hard

  • Proprietary data1.50B Domains 8.62B Keywords 529B Backlinks 5.6B Keywords suggestions 230 Countries 2.21B Google SERPs
  • Brand trusttrusted by 1.1M+ users
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying ischeaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 5 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it

AI build APIs + hosting

Time you would spend

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a self-hosted minimal SEO analytics service using: Node.js (Express) backend, Postgres database, Redis for scheduling, and a React UI. In scope: 1) SERP fetcher module with proxy rotation and parsers for Google/Bing that stores SERP snapshots; 2) Keyword and domain storage schema with historical rank table; 3) Scheduler workers to run periodic rank checks and site-audit crawls; 4) Basic site-audit scanner (HTTP status, meta tags, hreflang, canonical, sitemap check) and report exporter (CSV/JSON); 5) REST API endpoints for keyword lookup, rank history, and on-page audit results; 6) Docker-based deployment and documented env/config. Out of scope: building a billion-row proprietary index, browser extension, white-label reporting, and enterprise-grade multi-tenant billing. Include error handling for network/proxy failures, retries, rate-limit backoff, and unit/integration tests for the crawler, scheduler, and API.
How we checked2 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 50

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • 2 cited sources+1
  • Hard moats found in the evidence-3
  • Evidence score50

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time — so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 2

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

! Price not confirmed on the page — this pricing page renders its price in the browser! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 2 moats quoted from the page