SEO and marketing decision

SE Ranking

Do not rebuild — SE Ranking’s proprietary multi-billion keyword and domain datasets and built-in MCP/AI skills are core, hard-to-replicate advantages; a small team can reimplement limited features but will lose the data scale and accuracy.

Visit website
You pay

$50/mo

$600/yr

Read off the official pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off80 h to build

$200/mo20 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 5 seats.

The code exists. It is not what you are paying for.

This project is real, published, and does the core job — and this page still says keep paying. What the subscription buys is proprietary data, proprietary data and brand trust, and none of that ships in a repository. Fork it anyway if you want to. Go in knowing what it does not carry. What stays hard ↓ · All SE Ranking alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Accept a domain or keyword list → query live SERP/keyword/backlink/audit endpoints → store results in a database → surface reports and alerts via a small web UI and simple API

What it still won’t have

  • Massive proprietary data coverage (billions of keywords and domain profiles)
  • Prebuilt, production-tuned data pipelines and accuracy guarantees
  • MCP / built-in AI Skills and integrations to ChatGPT/Claude/etc.
  • Agency-ready reporting, white-label and multi-client management out of the box

What remains hard

  • Proprietary data5.5B Keyword database
  • Proprietary data2.2B Domain profiles
  • Brand trustTrusted by 40,000+ agencies
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 5 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal self-hosted SEO data service using Python (FastAPI), Postgres, and a worker (Celery or RQ) on a single VPS. Scope: accept domains/keyword lists, schedule recurring rank/serp/backlink/audit fetch jobs (use an external SERP/backlink provider or write modular scraper adapters), store results, provide an authenticated REST API to query latest metrics and rank history, and a basic web UI (React) with a dashboard, project view, and CSV export. Out of scope: building a multi-billion keyword database, advanced ML models, white-label portal, and global RPS scaling. Include error handling, retries, rate-limit backoff, test coverage for API and worker logic, and deployment scripts (Docker Compose).
How we checked4 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 28

How the score was reached

  • Pay verdict base20
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 4 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • Hard moats found in the evidence-3
  • Evidence score28

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 4

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 3 moats quoted from the page