AI assistants and search decision

Respira for WordPress

A capable developer can build a narrow replacement (Gutenberg-only safe-edit pipeline + MCP proxy) in a few weeks, but reproducing Respira's multi-builder tool catalog, WooCommerce add-on, persistent memory, and polish is not realistic without significant additional engineering.

Visit website
You pay

$9/mo

$108/yr

Read off the official pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off53 h to build

$20/mo6 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 4 seats.

No open-source build does this yet

Nothing published replaces this one, so a replacement starts from an empty file. Here is what it would have to cover.

What a replacement has to do

  • Agent -> MCP server -> WordPress plugin duplicates target content -> agent edits duplicate via tool endpoints -> admin reviews and approves -> plugin applies change

What it still won’t have

  • Support for 16+ page builders and the 300+ MCP tool catalog
  • WooCommerce add-on with 105 commerce tools and store-specific toolset
  • Resonance persistent site memory and enforced rules
  • Polished cross-builder SafeEdit, TimeSnap snapshots, and built-in audit telemetry
  • Integrations with Claude Cowork, Cursor, and other agents out of the box

What remains hard

  • Execution qualityThe leading AI infrastructure layer for WordPress.
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 4 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal Respira-like system that enables safe AI edits for a single WordPress site (Gutenberg only). Stack: WordPress plugin (PHP, WP REST API) + MCP proxy server (Node.js, Express). Core features in scope: (1) plugin endpoints to list pages, create a duplicate of a page/post, accept edited content and mark as proposed, (2) admin wp-admin interface to view diffs of proposed edits, approve/rollback, and an activity log, (3) MCP server that authenticates an agent via an API key, forwards a small subset of MCP tool calls (list_pages, read_page, create_page_duplicate, update_page), and signs events, (4) serialize/deserialize Gutenberg blocks for safe edit roundtrip, (5) a CLI install script to register an API key and test connection. Out of scope: multi-builder support (Elementor, Divi, etc.), WooCommerce store tools, persistent site memory (Resonance), multi-tenant/site dashboards, advanced telemetry. Require: authentication, input validation, error handling, basic unit and integration tests, and docs for setup and connecting one agent.
How we checked3 sources · 3/3 runs agreed · evidence score 62

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • 3 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • 3/3 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Evidence score62

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 3

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page✓ 3 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat quoted from the page