Learning and careers decision

Qaalib Tutors

A competent developer can replicate the core lesson delivery, payments and tracking, but cannot easily reproduce the instructor's curriculum, reputation, and production polish that justify paying this vendor.

Visit website
You pay

$25/mo

$300/yr

Read off the official pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off104 h to build

$25/mo6 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 2 seats.

No open-source build does this yet

Nothing published replaces this one, so a replacement starts from an empty file. Here is what it would have to cover.

What a replacement has to do

  • Students subscribe, watch bilingual lessons, do worked examples, track module progress and view past papers.

What it still won’t have

  • Instructor reputation and personalised live teaching from the named lead tutor
  • Proprietary course curriculum and accumulated student testimonials
  • Priority content requests and any support/operational services the vendor provides
  • Polish of production UX, analytics, and any established SEO/social channels

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 2 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a bilingual (English+Somali) GCSE/IGCSE maths learning web app using Next.js, PostgreSQL, and Stripe: include user auth (email + password), Stripe subscription billing, admin content CMS to upload lesson videos and PDFs, a lesson player supporting text/video and bilingual content, per-user progress tracking and completion badges, per-lesson saved notes, and an embedded PDF past-paper viewer. Out of scope: live video conferencing and automated grading. Provide error handling, authentication tests, unit tests for progress logic, and deployment scripts (Docker + DigitalOcean/Heroku).
How we checked1 sources · 1/3 runs agreed · evidence score 55

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • Evidence score55

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 1

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page! 1 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the middle of them✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded