Email and newsletters decision

Proton Mail Plus

A competent engineer can implement a useful encrypted webmail workflow (send/receive, basic encryption, domain support) using existing open-source mail stacks, but reproducing Proton’s scale, audits, ecosystem, and brand is impractical; keep paying for those enterprise-level benefits.

Visit website
You pay

$4.99/mo

$60/yr

Not verified against a pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off80 h to build

$0/mo8 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 2 seats.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Proton Mail Plus alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Provide end-to-end encrypted email accounts (send/receive) with web UI, support for custom domains, storage and search, and basic spam/filtering.

What it still won’t have

  • Proton’s global scale and infrastructure (100M+ users)
  • Brand trust and enterprise audits/certifications
  • Bundled ecosystem (VPN, Drive, Pass, Lumo AI) and native mobile/desktop apps
  • Independent security audits and long-term transparency/reporting

What remains hard

  • Infrastructure at scaleTrusted by over 100 million users and organizations
  • Brand trustOur transparency, open-source software, and rigorous encryption have earned Proton millions of users — and the recommendation of the United Nations.
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 2 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal, self-hosted encrypted webmail service using PostgreSQL, Redis, Postfix (or Mailu), Dovecot (IMAP), and a Node.js + React webmail UI. Core features in scope: account signup/login with 2FA, send/receive via SMTP/IMAP, client-side or zero-access message encryption storage (AES per-message with server-stored encrypted keys), inbox/folders/labels, attachments (S3-compatible storage), custom domain MX setup and DNS verification, and basic spam filtering (SpamAssassin). Out of scope: mobile apps, large-scale multi-region infra, proprietary AI features, enterprise compliance certifications. Require TLS everywhere, automated backups, monitoring (Prometheus/Grafana), error handling, and unit/integration tests for auth, mail flow, and storage encryption.
How we checked5 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 57

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 5 cited sources+3
  • Hard moats found in the evidence-3
  • Evidence score57

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 5

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

! Price not confirmed on the page - this pricing page renders its price in the browser! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 2 moats quoted from the page