Scheduling and meetings decision

PROCLINICA

A competent developer can assemble a useful self-hosted replacement using existing open-source EMR projects and standard APIs for calendar, billing, and messaging, but reproducing the vendor's certified VeriFactu/TicketBAI compliance, managed migration, and 24/7 support is operationally heavy and makes a full clone impractical for a single developer.

Visit website
You pay

Not priced

No pricing page we fetched carried a figure, so there is nothing to compare against. The build side is still real.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off160 h to build

$30/mo6 h/mo upkeep

No published price to break even against.

No open-source build does this yet

Nothing published replaces this one, so a replacement starts from an empty file. Here is what it would have to cover.

What a replacement has to do

  • Book and manage appointments, maintain patient records and consents, invoice with local tax e-invoicing (VeriFactu/TicketBAI), send reminders, and run multi-clinic scheduling.

What it still won’t have

  • 24/7 priority support and paid migration service
  • The vendor-hosted managed backups, SLA and guaranteed data residency processes
  • Turnkey VeriFactu/TicketBAI legal certification and ongoing regulatory support
  • Integrated videoconference and bundled SMS/WhatsApp quotas

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

No published price

PROCLINICA does not publish a price we could read, so there is nothing to compare against. What building costs is below.

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a self-hosted clinical practice manager using Node.js + Express, React, Postgres, and Docker. Include: (1) calendar/booking UI with bidirectional Google Calendar sync, (2) patient records with encrypted storage and digital consent capture, (3) billing module and adapters to call VeriFactu/TicketBAI endpoints (stubbed with configurable endpoints), (4) automated reminders via SMTP and Twilio/WhatsApp-compatible webhook, (5) multi-clinic and role-based access, (6) exports and basic reports. Out of scope: building a full VeriFactu certification program, high-volume SMS quotas, paid migration service, and 24/7 support. Provide error handling, input validation, basic unit and integration tests, Docker-compose deployment, and a README with setup and data residency notes.
How we checked3 sources · 3/3 runs agreed · evidence score 59

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • 3 cited sources+3
  • 3/3 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Evidence score59

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ 3 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded