Scheduling and meetings decision

meetergo

A competent developer or small team can self-host a useful meetergo replacement for scheduling and basic bookings in ~30 hours; the vendor's open-source MCP repo makes self-hosting easier so keeping the paid suite is only necessary for the full integrated EU-hosted AI, video, CRM and enterprise features.

Visit website
You pay

$9.9/mo

$119/yr

Per seat. Read off the official pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$20one-off6 h to build

$0/mo5 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 1 seat.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All meetergo alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Allow visitors to pick a time, verify availability against linked calendars, create booking record, send confirmation and calendar invite, and show a simple booking page UI.

What it still won’t have

  • Built-in video conferencing (meetergo Connect) and EU-hosted call recordings
  • Integrated CRM, e-signatures, invoices, portals, and advanced automations
  • Prebuilt integrations catalog and migration service
  • EU-hosted Mira AI meeting assistant and transcriptions (unless added separately)
  • Whitelabeling, priority support, and enterprise features (SSO/SCIM/Audit logs)

What remains hard

  • Compliance and regulation100% DSGVO konform
  • Compliance and regulationServer in Frankfurt
  • Compliance and regulationEU-gehostete Modelle
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 1 seat.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal self-hosted appointment booking service in Node.js (Express) + React, Postgres for storage, and Docker for deployment. Include OAuth calendar sync (Google + Microsoft) to check availability, booking pages with appointment types and availability rules, booking persistence in Postgres, transactional emails (SMTP/Mailgun), ICS calendar invites, a simple admin UI to create appointment types and view bookings, and a REST webhook endpoint for external notifications. Out of scope: video conferencing, CRM, e-signatures, AI transcription. Provide error handling, input validation, DB migrations, and unit tests for API endpoints. Include a Docker Compose setup and instructions to deploy on a single EU VPS.
How we checked4 sources · 1/1 runs agreed · evidence score 99

How the score was reached

  • Self-host verdict base92
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 4 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • 1/1 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Hard moats found in the evidence-3
  • Evidence score99

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 4

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page✓ 1 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 3 moats quoted from the page