AI assistants and search decision

PolyPick

A capable developer can reproduce the core screenshot→OCR→fetch data→LLM recommendation workflow in about a week and modest monthly cost, but Polypick's curated picks, copy-trade signals, real-time alerts, and aggregated user-data advantages would be hard to match without sustained effort and additional data.

Visit website
Subscription$39/month ✓ verified
Initial build30 hours
Monthly upkeep8 hours + $100
Evidence2/3 runs agree

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need — the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship.

What a replacement has to do

  • User uploads a screenshot of a market → extract market details (OCR + parsing) → gather market odds & recent news/data → run an AI scoring prompt to pick a side → return recommendation and confidence.

What it still won’t have

  • Curated daily picks from winning traders
  • Copy-trade signals from tracked wallets
  • Real-time alerts when odds change (requires polling/webhooks)
  • Smart risk scoring and AI Coach workflows
  • Polypick's historical user-data-derived hit-rate statistics

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying ischeaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 3 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it

AI build APIs + hosting

Time you would spend

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal Polypick-like web app using Node.js + Express, React, Postgres, and S3. Scope: (1) REST endpoint to upload a market screenshot and store it in S3; (2) run OCR (Tesseract or cloud OCR) to extract market title and candidate outcomes; (3) fetch current odds/prices from Polymarket/Kalshi/PredictIt public endpoints or scrape if no API; (4) fetch recent news/articles via a news API and run a prompt against an LLM (OpenAI) that returns: recommended side, confidence score, and short rationale; (5) simple React UI showing the screenshot, parsed market, odds, recommendation, and a button to copy the signal. Out of scope: wallet integrations, paid billing flows, curated social feed, advanced portfolio/risk engine, and copy-trading wallet-follow features. Include error handling for failed OCR, missing market data, and LLM timeouts; write unit tests for OCR parsing and the LLM scoring wrapper; provide deployment scripts (Docker + Heroku/GCP) and a small README with run instructions.
How we checked3 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 63

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 3 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • Evidence score63

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time — so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 3

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded