AI assistants and search decision

PolyPick

A capable developer can reproduce the core screenshot→OCR→fetch data→LLM recommendation workflow in about a week and modest monthly cost, but Polypick's curated picks, copy-trade signals, real-time alerts, and aggregated user-data advantages would be hard to match without sustained effort and additional data.

Visit website
You pay

$39/mo

$468/yr

Read off the official pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$50one-off30 h to build

$100/mo8 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 3 seats.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All PolyPick alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • User uploads a screenshot of a market → extract market details (OCR + parsing) → gather market odds & recent news/data → run an AI scoring prompt to pick a side → return recommendation and confidence.

What it still won’t have

  • Curated daily picks from winning traders
  • Copy-trade signals from tracked wallets
  • Real-time alerts when odds change (requires polling/webhooks)
  • Smart risk scoring and AI Coach workflows
  • Polypick's historical user-data-derived hit-rate statistics

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 3 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal Polypick-like web app using Node.js + Express, React, Postgres, and S3. Scope: (1) REST endpoint to upload a market screenshot and store it in S3; (2) run OCR (Tesseract or cloud OCR) to extract market title and candidate outcomes; (3) fetch current odds/prices from Polymarket/Kalshi/PredictIt public endpoints or scrape if no API; (4) fetch recent news/articles via a news API and run a prompt against an LLM (OpenAI) that returns: recommended side, confidence score, and short rationale; (5) simple React UI showing the screenshot, parsed market, odds, recommendation, and a button to copy the signal. Out of scope: wallet integrations, paid billing flows, curated social feed, advanced portfolio/risk engine, and copy-trading wallet-follow features. Include error handling for failed OCR, missing market data, and LLM timeouts; write unit tests for OCR parsing and the LLM scoring wrapper; provide deployment scripts (Docker + Heroku/GCP) and a small README with run instructions.
How we checked3 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 63

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 3 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • Evidence score63

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 3

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded