Games and entertainment decision

Pickoo

A capable developer can build the core picks, scoring, and leaderboard in a few weeks, but reproducing operator responsibilities (prize handling, legal, brand and userbase) is outside a small DIY scope.

Visit website
You pay

Not priced

No pricing page we fetched carried a figure, so there is nothing to compare against. The build side is still real.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off60 h to build

$0/mo6 h/mo upkeep

No published price to break even against.

No open-source build does this yet

Nothing published replaces this one, so a replacement starts from an empty file. Here is what it would have to cover.

What a replacement has to do

  • Users sign up, submit match predictions (winner and exact score), scoring engine computes points, leaderboard ranks players, admin handles prize distribution.

What it still won’t have

  • Existing userbase and network/brand-driven traffic
  • Prize management, escrow and legal/compliance handled by operator
  • Mobile app polish and any platform-specific push/notification integrations
  • Established rules, dispute resolution workflow, and trust for payouts

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

No published price

Pickoo does not publish a price we could read, so there is nothing to compare against. What building costs is below.

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal web app (React frontend, Node.js/Express backend, Postgres DB, deployed on Vercel/Heroku or a single managed VM) that runs a free-to-play tournament picks contest. In scope: email+username sign-up (no password) with token auth; admin interface to create matches and set prize tiers; user interface to submit a winner and exact score per match; a scoring engine implemented as a scheduled backend job that applies rules (exact score = 8 pts, correct winner = 3 pts, else 0) and updates leaderboards; public leaderboard pages with pagination; simple CSV export for payouts and an admin view for marking paid winners. Out of scope: payment processing, automated prize escrow, mobile native apps, federated logins, analytics dashboards, and fraud detection. Include input validation, error handling, unit tests for scoring logic, and basic end-to-end tests for pick submission and leaderboard updates.
How we checked1 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 52

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • Evidence score52

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 1

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded