Design and diagrams decision

PatentFig

A competent developer can build a useful, smaller patent-figure generator for personal or small-firm use within a week and modest monthly cloud/model costs, but reproducing the vendor's proprietary model quality, enterprise guarantees, and compliance assurances is not realistic.

Visit website
You pay

$50/mo

$600/yr

Read off the official pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off40 h to build

$125/mo6 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 3 seats.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All PatentFig alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Upload reference image or enter description → run image-to-line/figure generation model → vectorize/clean output → apply office-export templates and download SVG/TIFF/PDF.

What it still won’t have

  • Proprietary generation quality and ongoing model improvements provided by the vendor
  • Contractual security, DPA/NDA and Trust Center assurances out of the box
  • Enterprise features such as team pipelines, high-volume throughput guarantees and SLA-backed support
  • Polished UX and built-in multi-office compliance testing/certification workflows

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 3 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal self-hosted PatentFig-like web service using Next.js for the frontend, Node/Express for the API, PostgreSQL for metadata, and S3-compatible storage (DigitalOcean Spaces or AWS S3). Use a hosted GPU instance (or managed inference endpoint) to run an image-to-line or image-to-figure model (or call a hosted image-inference API) and implement a raster-to-vector step using an open-source tracer (e.g., potrace via node bindings). Core features in scope: file upload, authenticated user account, one-project workspace, synchronous POST /generate that returns SVG/PNG, versioning (V1, V1.1), simple chat-to-edit flow that accepts textual edits and triggers a regeneration, and export endpoints producing SVG/PDF/TIFF at configurable DPI. Out of scope: training new models, enterprise multi-team billing, legal DPA/NDA contracts, and certified multi-office compliance testing. Include error handling, idempotent request keys, automated tests for upload/generation/export flows, and deployment scripts (Docker + Terraform or DigitalOcean App Platform).
How we checked5 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 63

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 5 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • Evidence score63

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 5

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded