Design and diagrams decision

Miro

A single developer can build a narrow collaborative whiteboard covering Miro's core canvas and realtime sync, but reproducing Miro's scale, ecosystem (integrations/templates), AI workflows, and enterprise security is impractical—keep paying for full product unless you only need a limited, self-hosted canvas.

Visit website
You pay

$8/mo

$96/yr

Per seat. Read off the official pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off80 h to build

$0/mo10 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 2 seats.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Miro alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Create a shared canvas, add and arrange shapes/sticky notes/frames, realtime multi-user updates, and export/share boards.

What it still won’t have

  • Scale and global low-latency infrastructure for hundreds of thousands of concurrent users
  • 250+ built-in third-party integrations and prebuilt templates
  • Enterprise-grade security, compliance and governance controls
  • AI workflows, agent orchestration, and bundled AI credits
  • Polish: mobile apps, device integrations, and long-tail feature set

What remains hard

  • Brand trust100M+ people collaborating on Miro
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 2 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal, self-hosted collaborative whiteboard: use React + TypeScript for the front end, Node.js + Express for the API, PostgreSQL for storage, Redis for ephemeral presence, and Socket.IO for realtime sync. Implement: user auth (email/password or OAuth), create/edit/delete boards, shapes/sticky notes/text/connectors with Z-order and transform, realtime presence and cursor positions, board persistence with optimistic updates, and export selected frames to PNG/PDF. Out of scope: AI workflows/agents, 3rd-party app marketplace, enterprise compliance features, native mobile apps. Include end-to-end and unit tests, input validation, rate limiting, and basic monitoring/alerts for uptime/errors.
How we checked5 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 63

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 5 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • Evidence score63

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 5

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat quoted from the page