Design and diagrams decision

Miro

A single developer can build a narrow collaborative whiteboard covering Miro's core canvas and realtime sync, but reproducing Miro's scale, ecosystem (integrations/templates), AI workflows, and enterprise security is impractical—keep paying for full product unless you only need a limited, self-hosted canvas.

Visit website
Subscription$8/month ✓ verified
Initial build80 hours
Monthly upkeep10 hours + $0
Evidence2/3 runs agree

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Miro alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Create a shared canvas, add and arrange shapes/sticky notes/frames, realtime multi-user updates, and export/share boards.

What it still won’t have

  • Scale and global low-latency infrastructure for hundreds of thousands of concurrent users
  • 250+ built-in third-party integrations and prebuilt templates
  • Enterprise-grade security, compliance and governance controls
  • AI workflows, agent orchestration, and bundled AI credits
  • Polish: mobile apps, device integrations, and long-tail feature set

What remains hard

  • Brand trust100M+ people collaborating on Miro
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying ischeaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 2 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it

AI build APIs + hosting

Time you would spend

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal, self-hosted collaborative whiteboard: use React + TypeScript for the front end, Node.js + Express for the API, PostgreSQL for storage, Redis for ephemeral presence, and Socket.IO for realtime sync. Implement: user auth (email/password or OAuth), create/edit/delete boards, shapes/sticky notes/text/connectors with Z-order and transform, realtime presence and cursor positions, board persistence with optimistic updates, and export selected frames to PNG/PDF. Out of scope: AI workflows/agents, 3rd-party app marketplace, enterprise compliance features, native mobile apps. Include end-to-end and unit tests, input validation, rate limiting, and basic monitoring/alerts for uptime/errors.
How we checked5 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 63

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 5 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • Evidence score63

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 5

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat quoted from the page