AI assistants and search decision

Kickly - Pronos IA 🎯

A competent developer can build a useful MVP replacement (data ingestion, model, simple UI) and run it cheaply; no durable moats are evident from the provided page so self-hosting is realistic.

Visit website
You pay

Not priced

No pricing page we fetched carried a figure, so there is nothing to compare against. The build side is still real.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off46 h to build

$50/mo3 h/mo upkeep

No published price to break even against.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Kickly - Pronos IA 🎯 alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Ingest match and team data, compute features, run prediction model, present predictions and confidence to user, refresh predictions on schedule

What it still won’t have

  • Existing Kickly user base and brand
  • Any proprietary training data or tightly-tuned proprietary models Kickly may have
  • Commercial integrations (paid odds feeds, analytics partnerships) if present
  • Turn-key polished UX, onboarding flows and product polish
  • Support SLA and marketing/distribution

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

No published price

Kickly - Pronos IA 🎯 does not publish a price we could read, so there is nothing to compare against. What building costs is below.

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal self‑hosted football prediction service using PostgreSQL, Python (FastAPI), scikit-learn or LightGBM for models, and a small React frontend. Core features: (1) ingest public match and team data (use Transfermarkt CSVs or public APIs) and normalize to Postgres; (2) implement a reproducible feature engineering pipeline and train a simple predictive model and expose a /predict API; (3) web UI listing upcoming matches with predicted outcome and confidence; (4) scheduler to refresh data and recompute predictions daily; (5) basic user authentication, logging, and error handling; (6) Dockerfiles, deployment scripts for a single VPS (Docker Compose), and unit tests for ingestion, model, and API. Out of scope: training large neural networks, paid odds-feed integrations, mobile apps, and multi-tenant billing. Include input validation, retry/backoff for external fetches, and CI tests that run model training on a small sample dataset.
How we checked2 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 84

How the score was reached

  • Build verdict base78
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 2 cited sources+1
  • Evidence score84

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 2

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded