AI assistants and search decision

Jared Stivala

A competent developer can build a usable macOS AI-autocomplete replacement (prior open-source projects exist), but reproducing the polished, signed distribution, support, and bundled model access of a paid product is non-trivial.

Visit website
You pay

Not priced

No pricing page we fetched carried a figure, so there is nothing to compare against. The build side is still real.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off90 h to build

$50/mo3 h/mo upkeep

No published price to break even against.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Jared Stivala alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Intercept typed text system-wide, send context to an LLM, receive completions, insert completions inline, allow user to accept/edit.

What it still won’t have

  • Polish and UX refinements (edge-case input handling across mac apps)
  • Officially signed/notarized app distribution and update infrastructure
  • Customer support, analytics, and usage-driven model tuning
  • Any proprietary server-side optimizations, telemetry, or bundled model access

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

No published price

Jared Stivala does not publish a price we could read, so there is nothing to compare against. What building costs is below.

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a macOS menubar AI-autocomplete app using Swift + SwiftUI for the UI and a small local SQLite store. Integrate with an external LLM via HTTPS (e.g., OpenAI-compatible API). Core features in scope: system-wide keyboard listener using Accessibility APIs, context capture (last N tokens per window), prompt construction, async API calls with timeout and caching, inline completion insertion with undo, basic settings UI (toggle, model API key, max tokens), and auto-update check. Out of scope: proprietary model training, multi-device sync, paid billing system, advanced telemetry. Include error handling for API/network failures, accessibility permission checks, unit tests for prompt construction and insertion logic, and CI build scripts for notarized packaging.
How we checked3 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 60

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 3 cited sources+3
  • Evidence score60

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 3

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded