CRM and sales decision

Indy

A competent developer can build a narrow self-hosted replacement (CRM + invoices + time tracking + basic contracts) using existing open-source projects, but reproducing Indy's full polished product (AI assistant, integrations, storage tiers, and UX polish) would take substantial extra effort.

Visit website
Subscription$12.5/month ✓ verified
Initial build80 hours
Monthly upkeep8 hours + $0
Evidence3/3 runs agree

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Indy alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Manage clients and projects, create/send proposals & contracts, track time, generate invoices, accept payments, store files

What it still won’t have

  • Polished UI/UX and cross-tool automation polish
  • Built-in AI digital assistant (Pro feature)
  • Advanced templates, white-labeling, and large-storage tiers
  • Support SLAs, hosted reliability and security hardening
  • Community, help hub content, and product updates

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying ischeaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 1 seat.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it

AI build APIs + hosting

Time you would spend

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal Indy-like freelance business hub using Node.js (Express), PostgreSQL, React, and AWS S3. Implement: (1) user auth and a client CRM linking contacts to projects; (2) a rich-text proposal/contract editor that exports to PDF and stores signed PDFs with a simple signature token flow; (3) invoice creation with line items, PDF export, Stripe checkout links and webhook handling for payments; (4) a start/stop time tracker tied to projects and an exportable report; (5) file upload to S3 with metadata and basic revision comments; (6) embeddable web form that creates leads in CRM. Out of scope: built-in AI assistant, multi-tenant billing plans, advanced template marketplaces, mobile apps, and community features. Include input validation, error handling, authentication/authorization tests, unit tests for core business logic, and end-to-end tests for payment and signing flows.
How we checked4 sources · 3/3 runs agreed · evidence score 67

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 4 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • 3/3 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Evidence score67

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 4

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page✓ 3 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded