CRM and sales decision

Indy

A competent developer can build a narrow self-hosted replacement (CRM + invoices + time tracking + basic contracts) using existing open-source projects, but reproducing Indy's full polished product (AI assistant, integrations, storage tiers, and UX polish) would take substantial extra effort.

Visit website
You pay

$12.5/mo

$150/yr

Read off the official pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off80 h to build

$0/mo8 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 1 seat.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Indy alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Manage clients and projects, create/send proposals & contracts, track time, generate invoices, accept payments, store files

What it still won’t have

  • Polished UI/UX and cross-tool automation polish
  • Built-in AI digital assistant (Pro feature)
  • Advanced templates, white-labeling, and large-storage tiers
  • Support SLAs, hosted reliability and security hardening
  • Community, help hub content, and product updates

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 1 seat.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal Indy-like freelance business hub using Node.js (Express), PostgreSQL, React, and AWS S3. Implement: (1) user auth and a client CRM linking contacts to projects; (2) a rich-text proposal/contract editor that exports to PDF and stores signed PDFs with a simple signature token flow; (3) invoice creation with line items, PDF export, Stripe checkout links and webhook handling for payments; (4) a start/stop time tracker tied to projects and an exportable report; (5) file upload to S3 with metadata and basic revision comments; (6) embeddable web form that creates leads in CRM. Out of scope: built-in AI assistant, multi-tenant billing plans, advanced template marketplaces, mobile apps, and community features. Include input validation, error handling, authentication/authorization tests, unit tests for core business logic, and end-to-end tests for payment and signing flows.
How we checked4 sources · 3/3 runs agreed · evidence score 67

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 4 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • 3/3 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Evidence score67

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 4

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page✓ 3 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded