CRM and sales decision

Huntly

A technical user can reproduce the core lead-finding workflow (search, extract, score, export) in about a week using existing scraping tools and the cited prior-art, but matching Huntly's scale, reliability, multi-country coverage, and polished UX/support is nontrivial and requires ongoing scraping infrastructure and legal/operational work.

Visit website
You pay

$9/mo

$108/yr

Read off the official pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off36 h to build

$120/mo6 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 15 seats.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Huntly alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Run a search by niche and city → crawl Google Maps results, filter businesses without a website and extract phone numbers → score opportunities → present leads with click-to-call/WhatsApp and save/export.

What it still won’t have

  • Reliable large-scale crawling infrastructure and IP/proxy pool for Google Maps
  • Ongoing data-quality and anti-blocking engineering (retries, CAPTCHA handling)
  • Polished UX, priority support, and built-in demo/landing-page generation per lead
  • Legal/compliance guidance for scraping and outreach best-practices
  • Country coverage tuning and continuous updates for Google Maps changes

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 15 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a self-hosted local-prospecting web app using Node.js (Express) + Puppeteer/Playwright for crawling, PostgreSQL for storage, and React for the frontend. Core features: (1) search by niche and city and enqueue crawl jobs; (2) crawl Google Maps results and extract name, address, phone, rating, review count, and website presence; (3) compute an opportunity score from rating/reviews/activity; (4) present paginated results with click-to-call and WhatsApp links, save-to-portfolio, search history, and CSV export; (5) simple user auth and a single paid account simulation. Out of scope: paid subscription billing, demo landing-page generator, large-scale proxy management, and legal/compliance automation. Include error handling for crawl failures, retries/backoff, unit and integration tests, and deployment instructions (Docker).
How we checked4 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 63

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 4 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • Evidence score63

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 4

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded