AI assistants and search decision

HouseGPTS

A capable developer can reproduce a useful subset (photo upload, style-based image generations, basic exports) using public image-generation APIs and an open-source floor-plan UI, but the full product—high-quality tuned engines, large-scale queueing, HD/360 features, and production credit/billing systems—relies on proprietary models, operational polish, and scale that are hard to replicate cheaply.

Visit website
You pay

$20/mo

$240/yr

Read off the official pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off70 h to build

$200/mo6 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 11 seats.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All HouseGPTS alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Upload a photo → select style/designer → run image-to-image AI to produce variations → present variations and allow HD export/download.

What it still won’t have

  • Access to vendor-tuned premium AI engines and any proprietary model optimizations
  • Polished multi-variation generation with per-render credit accounting and mixing of engine costs
  • HD export pipeline and watermark-free commercial export handling at scale
  • Floor Plan Studio, 360° room panoramas and Home Tour multi-room walkthrough builders
  • Operational polish: queueing at scale, priority support, and ongoing model/engine management

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 11 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal AI home-design web app using Next.js (React) frontend, Node.js/Express backend, PostgreSQL for accounts/credits, and AWS S3 for image storage. Integrate a third-party image-generation API (eg. OpenAI/Stable API) for image-to-image/inpainting. Implement: 1) authenticated photo upload with basic segmentation/masking and preprocessing; 2) style/designer selection UI and generation request flow that queues jobs; 3) worker to call the image API, save variants, and return thumbnails; 4) variation gallery with preview and HD export (stored to S3); 5) per-user credit decrementing and simple billing placeholder (no payment gateway required for prototype). Out of scope: training/custom AI models, multi-room 360° viewer, full commercial billing/enterprise features. Require error handling for failed API calls, retries, and unit tests for upload, queue, and API worker flows.
How we checked3 sources · 1/3 runs agreed · evidence score 63

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 3 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • Evidence score63

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 3

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page! 1 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the middle of them✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded