AI assistants and search decision

Hana AI

A capable engineer can build a narrow, usable Hana replacement for one workspace (chat bot + basic retrieval + actions) in a multi-week effort, but matching the vendor's product polish, reviews, and enterprise controls is costly and the vendor advantages favor keeping the paid service.

Visit website
You pay

Not priced

No pricing page we fetched carried a figure, so there is nothing to compare against. The build side is still real.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off112 h to build

$150/mo6 h/mo upkeep

No published price to break even against.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Hana AI alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • User mentions bot in Google Chat → bot retrieves relevant chat/docs/context → bot summarizes and proposes next step → bot creates a reminder/task/poll in-thread or returns a grounded answer.

What it still won’t have

  • Polished, native Google Chat UX and edge-case handling for threaded conversations
  • Enterprise-grade admin controls, approvals, and source governance
  • Operational reliability, SLAs, and support from the vendor
  • Ongoing improvements, prompt engineering, and product polish
  • Built-in action library and pre-authored prompt examples

What remains hard

  • Brand trustRated 4.72/5 from 18 reviews on Google Workspace Marketplace .
  • Execution qualityThe first useful loop should take minutes, not a training session.
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

No published price

Hana AI does not publish a price we could read, so there is nothing to compare against. What building costs is below.

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal Hana-like service: use Node.js + Express for the backend, PostgreSQL for metadata, Redis for ephemeral state, and a small vector DB (e.g. pgvector) for retrieval; host on a single small cloud VM (or App Service). Core features in scope: (1) Google Workspace OAuth install flow and permissioned connectors to index Google Drive (Docs, Sheets, PDFs), (2) a Google Chat bot that listens for @mentions and posts structured in-thread replies, (3) ingestion pipeline to extract text, compute embeddings (OpenAI or compatible API), and store vectors, (4) a retrieval + summarization handler that returns evidence-backed answers and can create reminders/tasks/polls via the Chat API, (5) a simple admin dashboard to connect sources and control rollout. Out of scope: multi-tenant billing, enterprise compliance certifications, advanced prompt tuning, high-availability scaling, and polished UI/UX. Require: error handling for failed API calls and token refresh, request-level logging, end-to-end tests for the bot flow, and basic unit tests for ingestion and retrieval.
How we checked4 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 60

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 4 cited sources+3
  • Evidence score60

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 4

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 2 moats quoted from the page