SEO and marketing decision

GetMentioned

A capable engineer can build a one-brand replacement (daily runners, storage, metrics, basic dashboard) in about a week, but reproducing GetMentioned's enterprise features, scale, MCP integrations, and product polish would be costly — keep paying for full coverage or build a narrow internal tool.

Visit website
You pay

$89/mo

$1,068/yr

Read off the official pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off40 h to build

$100/mo6 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 2 seats.

No open-source build does this yet

Nothing published replaces this one, so a replacement starts from an empty file. Here is what it would have to cover.

What a replacement has to do

  • Daily run a set of customer prompts across multiple LLM APIs, capture full model answers, store them, compute visibility/position metrics by topic and source, surface dashboards and weekly reports, and provide a simple API or exports.

What it still won’t have

  • Multi-brand & enterprise features (white-label, SLAs)
  • Same-day priority support and account services
  • Polished UI, live demo data, and historical dataset depth at scale
  • Custom/Large-scale LLM coverage (enterprise) and MCP server integrations

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 2 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal AI-visibility monitor in Node.js + Postgres deployed to a single small cloud VM (or managed DB + serverless functions). Core features: (1) scheduler that runs a configurable list of prompts daily against three LLM APIs (OpenAI-compatible, Perplexity, and Gemini via HTTP clients), (2) store raw responses, model, timestamp, and source domain in Postgres, (3) compute visibility score, rank position per prompt, and group prompts into Topics, (4) a simple authenticated React dashboard showing visibility, top sources, and competitor comparison, (5) weekly report generator that exports PDF/CSV, (6) a small read-only REST API to fetch mentions and scores. Out of scope: white-labeling, multi-brand management, SLA/premium support, MCP server. Include error handling for API failures, retries/backoff, input validation, and unit/integration tests for scheduler, storage, and metrics code.
How we checked3 sources · 3/3 runs agreed · evidence score 62

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • 3 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • 3/3 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Evidence score62

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page✓ 3 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded