CRM and sales decision

GESWORK

A technical user can build or self-host a useful subset (contacts, scheduling, invoicing, client portal) but reproducing the full polished SaaS (managed hosting, support, integrations, mobile apps) is time-consuming; existing OSS CRM/ERP projects can be used as a foundation.

Visit website
You pay

Not priced

No pricing page we fetched carried a figure, so there is nothing to compare against. The build side is still real.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off120 h to build

$0/mo6 h/mo upkeep

No published price to break even against.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All GESWORK alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Manage clients and jobs: create clients, plan interventions, generate quotes/invoices, share documents with clients, and track status from a web UI.

What it still won’t have

  • Hosted SLA, support and managed onboarding
  • Polish of a production SaaS product (UX, mobile apps, integrations)
  • Built-in backups, monitoring, and platform hardening unless separately implemented
  • Existing customer portal branding and vendor-maintained updates

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

No published price

GESWORK does not publish a price we could read, so there is nothing to compare against. What building costs is below.

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a self-hostable SaaS replacement using: backend Node.js + NestJS (or Laravel/PHP if preferred), Postgres, Redis (jobs), React for frontend, and S3-compatible object storage. Core features in scope: user auth and company tenancy; contacts/customers; interventions/work orders with calendar UI; quotes and invoice creation + PDF export; client portal to view invoices/quotes and download reports; file attachments and basic messaging; email notifications for scheduling. Out of scope: mobile native apps, multi-currency accounting, advanced payroll. Deliverables must include Docker-based deployment, automated DB migrations, background job workers, basic E2E tests for main flows, logging/health endpoints, and error handling with retries for failed jobs.
How we checked3 sources · 3/3 runs agreed · evidence score 64

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 3 cited sources+3
  • 3/3 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Evidence score64

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 3

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ 3 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded