CRM and sales decision

Fidelatoo

A small technical team can implement a useful subset (phone-based enrollment, QR cards, SMS, basic analytics) rapidly, but they would lose the vendor's claimed wallet visibility, large user network, and polished product/support — and Fidelatoo's network/brand advantages are nontrivial to reproduce.

Visit website
You pay

$25/mo

$300/yr

Read off the official pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$50one-off30 h to build

$30/mo8 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 2 seats.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Fidelatoo alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Enroll customer by phone number → award points → show/update digital loyalty card (QR) → redeem rewards

What it still won’t have

  • Apple/Google Wallet deep integration and claimed visibility via their wallet network
  • Access to Fidelatoo’s claimed large user base and cross-merchant visibility
  • Polished merchant-facing product, tested UX, and support team
  • Built-in SMS credits model and premium support

What remains hard

  • Network effectsBoostez votre visibilité locale auprès de nos +500 000 utilisateurs via le Wallet Apple/Google
  • Brand trust4,6 sur Apple Store
  • Brand trustJoin the largest network of local businesses, operating in +25 countries .
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 2 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a self-hosted merchant loyalty web app using Node.js (Express), Postgres, and React. In scope: merchant sign-up, create/edit loyalty programs and tiers, staff accounts, customer enrollment by phone number, per-customer QR code pages, API endpoints to award points and redeem rewards, CSV import of customers, SMS sending via Twilio, and a simple analytics dashboard (weekly visits, repeat rate, points issued). Out of scope: native Apple/Google Wallet pass generation and geo-targeted wallet push channels. Include error handling, input validation, authentication (JWT + role-based staff access), automated tests for API endpoints, and containerized deployment (Docker) with a sample docker-compose for Postgres + app. Document setup steps and env vars for Twilio and hosting.
How we checked4 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 60

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 4 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • Hard moats found in the evidence-3
  • Evidence score60

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 4

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 3 moats quoted from the page