Scheduling and meetings decision

Fellow

A small team or single developer can build a basic meeting transcription + summarization workflow (uploads, ASR, LLM summaries, UI), but reproducing Fellow’s enterprise-grade compliance, audit controls, broad conferencing integrations, and org-scale features is not realistic without substantial additional effort and investment.

Visit website
Subscription$11/month ✓ verified
Initial build30 hours
Monthly upkeep8 hours + $100
Evidence3/3 runs agree

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need — the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship.

What a replacement has to do

  • Upload/record meeting audio → transcribe audio → generate structured summary + action items → store transcript & summary → search/playback recordings

What it still won’t have

  • Enterprise compliance certifications and audit-ready controls (SOC2/HIPAA/GDPR)
  • Advanced admin controls (zero-day retention, transcript redaction, information barriers)
  • 50+ out-of-the-box integrations (CRM, Slack, calendar platforms)
  • Bot-free live capture across conferencing platforms and org-wide recording policies
  • AskFellow cross-meeting agent and advanced org analytics

What remains hard

  • Compliance and regulationBuilt to serve regulated financial institutions.
  • Compliance and regulationSOC 2 Type II, and GDPR certified, with MNPI-aware workflows and analyst-style summaries that capture decisions and action items.
  • Compliance and regulationOur AI is never trained on your data.
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying ischeaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 10 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it

AI build APIs + hosting

Time you would spend

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal AI meeting-notes web app using: React frontend, Node/Express backend, Postgres, S3-compatible storage, and OpenAI (or open-source) ASR + LLM. In scope: (1) upload or attach meeting audio, (2) store audio in S3, (3) transcribe audio via Whisper (local or API), (4) call an LLM to produce a structured meeting summary and extract action items, (5) store transcript, summary, and metadata in Postgres, (6) simple UI to list recordings, play audio, view transcript and summary, (7) basic full-text search over transcripts. Out of scope: live bot joining Zoom/Teams/Google Meet, enterprise compliance certification (SOC2/HIPAA), advanced admin policies, and 3rd-party CRM integrations. Include error handling, retries for ASR/LLM calls, authentication (JWT), and unit/integration tests for API endpoints.
How we checked5 sources · 3/3 runs agreed · evidence score 64

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 5 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • 3/3 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Hard moats found in the evidence-3
  • Evidence score64

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time — so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 5

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page✓ 3 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 3 moats quoted from the page