Design and diagrams decision

Excalidraw+

A single experienced developer can build a useful self-hosted/small-team replacement (canvas, save/load, exports, basic LLM diagramming) in about a week; Excalidraw+’s main durable advantage is brand trust rather than proprietary technical moat.

Visit website
Subscription$6/month ✓ verified
Initial build30 hours
Monthly upkeep6 hours + $50
Evidence2/3 runs agree

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need — the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship.

What a replacement has to do

  • Open a canvas, draw/modify shapes with pointer input, save/load scenes, export PNG/SVG, optionally generate a diagram from text via an LLM.

What it still won’t have

  • enterprise features (teams management, access controls)
  • cloud-hosted backups and server-side syncing at scale
  • read-only embeds/managed sharing and workspace collections
  • voice hangouts & screensharing integrated in product
  • extended AI features and MCP integrations provided by vendor

What remains hard

  • Brand trustTrusted by the largest companies in the world
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying ischeaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 10 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it

AI build APIs + hosting

Time you would spend

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal Excalidraw+ replacement using React for UI, HTML5 Canvas (or SVG) for drawing, Node.js + Express for an API, PostgreSQL (or S3) for scene storage, and a WebSocket server for realtime diffs. In scope: interactive canvas with shapes and freehand, save/load scenes to server, export PNG/SVG, user sign-in (email link or simple JWT), simple text-to-diagram integration using an LLM API (configurable key), and a small admin dashboard to view saved scenes. Out of scope: enterprise single-sign-on, paid billing, heavy multi-tenant scaling, advanced voice hangouts, and a hosted MCP. Require: input validation, conflict handling for concurrent edits, retry/backoff for external API calls, server-side rate limits, automated tests (unit for core logic, integration for API endpoints), and Dockerfiles for local dev and production. Provide README with deployment steps and health-check endpoints.
How we checked5 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 89

How the score was reached

  • Build verdict base78
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 5 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • Evidence score89

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time — so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 5

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat quoted from the page