Project and task management decision

Everhour

A capable developer can build a useful self-hosted replacement (timers, projects, budgets, reports, alerts) within a week and keep it running for small teams, but you'll miss Everhour's polished native apps, broad integrations and enterprise support.

Visit website
Subscription$10/month
Initial build30 hours
Monthly upkeep8 hours + $0
Evidence2/3 runs agree

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Everhour alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Allow team members to start/stop timers tied to tasks/projects, store time entries with billable/non-billable flags and rates, enforce project budgets and emit alerts, and generate downloadable profitability/time reports.

What it still won’t have

  • Native desktop/mobile apps and browser extension
  • Deep, production-grade integrations (40+ native integrations)
  • Enterprise features like SSO/advanced permissions at scale and priority support
  • Brand polish, reliability, and ongoing product updates from Everhour team
  • Screenshots tracker and specialized Trello power-up

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying ischeaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 1 seat.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it

AI build APIs + hosting

Time you would spend

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a self-hosted single-tenant time-tracking web app using Next.js (React) frontend, Node.js (Express) API, and PostgreSQL. Implement: user auth and team/seat management; start/stop timer and manual time entry forms; project/task models with hourly rates and budget fields; server-side budget-checking logic and background job to send email/webhook alerts; reporting endpoints that aggregate time by project/client and export CSV; simple admin UI for invoices/exports. Out of scope: native desktop/mobile clients, browser extension, and 3rd-party marketplace integrations. Include input validation, error handling, unit tests for API logic, and a Docker Compose setup for local dev and production deployment.
How we checked5 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 86

How the score was reached

  • Build verdict base78
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 5 cited sources+3
  • Evidence score86

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 5

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

! Price not confirmed on the page - this pricing page renders its price in the browser! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded