CRM and sales decision

Dubsado

A competent developer can build a useful subset (client CRM + invoices + scheduling + basic workflows) in a few months, but reproducing Dubsado's scale, payments infrastructure, polished apps, and support ecosystem is costly—keep paying for the full product if you need those at-scale features.

Visit website
Subscription$27.92/month ✓ verified
Initial build80 hours
Monthly upkeep12 hours + $0
Evidence3/3 runs agree

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need — the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship.

What a replacement has to do

  • Manage clients and projects, send branded invoices (Stripe/Pay provider), collect signed contracts/forms, schedule appointments with calendar sync, and automate simple workflows (triggered emails and task creation).

What it still won’t have

  • Mobile apps and polished UX (apps and cross-platform polish)
  • Large-scale payments & instant-payout infrastructure and risk handling
  • Proprietary integrations and bookkeeping connectors
  • World-class customer care and onboarding resources
  • Established brand trust and marketplace of certified specialists

What remains hard

  • Brand trustTrusted by 120,000+ creatives over the last 10 years
  • Infrastructure at scale$4+ billion In payments processed
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying ischeaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 1 seat.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it

AI build APIs + hosting

Time you would spend

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a self-hosted client management MVP using PostgreSQL, a Node.js + Express backend, and a React frontend. Implement: (1) user auth and single-brand account; (2) client/contact and project CRUD with dashboard and project status; (3) invoice creation and Stripe payment integration including webhooks and basic reporting; (4) a form/contract builder that stores filled forms and captures e-signature (PDF export); (5) booking flow with Google Calendar OAuth sync; (6) a rule-based workflow runner to send templated emails and create tasks. Out of scope: multi-brand billing, mobile apps, advanced bookkeeping integrations, PCI-level managed payouts. Include error handling, input validation, tests for core APIs, and Docker compose for local dev and deployment.
How we checked5 sources · 3/3 runs agreed · evidence score 64

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 5 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • 3/3 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Hard moats found in the evidence-3
  • Evidence score64

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time — so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 5

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page✓ 3 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 2 moats quoted from the page