CRM and sales decision

Dubsado

A competent developer can build a useful subset (client CRM + invoices + scheduling + basic workflows) in a few months, but reproducing Dubsado's scale, payments infrastructure, polished apps, and support ecosystem is costly—keep paying for the full product if you need those at-scale features.

Visit website
You pay

$27.92/mo

$335/yr

Per seat. Read off the official pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off80 h to build

$0/mo12 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 1 seat.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Dubsado alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Manage clients and projects, send branded invoices (Stripe/Pay provider), collect signed contracts/forms, schedule appointments with calendar sync, and automate simple workflows (triggered emails and task creation).

What it still won’t have

  • Mobile apps and polished UX (apps and cross-platform polish)
  • Large-scale payments & instant-payout infrastructure and risk handling
  • Proprietary integrations and bookkeeping connectors
  • World-class customer care and onboarding resources
  • Established brand trust and marketplace of certified specialists

What remains hard

  • Brand trustTrusted by 120,000+ creatives over the last 10 years
  • Infrastructure at scale$4+ billion In payments processed
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 1 seat.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a self-hosted client management MVP using PostgreSQL, a Node.js + Express backend, and a React frontend. Implement: (1) user auth and single-brand account; (2) client/contact and project CRUD with dashboard and project status; (3) invoice creation and Stripe payment integration including webhooks and basic reporting; (4) a form/contract builder that stores filled forms and captures e-signature (PDF export); (5) booking flow with Google Calendar OAuth sync; (6) a rule-based workflow runner to send templated emails and create tasks. Out of scope: multi-brand billing, mobile apps, advanced bookkeeping integrations, PCI-level managed payouts. Include error handling, input validation, tests for core APIs, and Docker compose for local dev and deployment.
How we checked5 sources · 3/3 runs agreed · evidence score 64

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 5 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • 3/3 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Hard moats found in the evidence-3
  • Evidence score64

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 5

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page✓ 3 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 2 moats quoted from the page