AI assistants and search decision

Depost AI

A capable developer can build a useful subset (post generation, bookmarks, scheduler, reply drafts) in about a week, but full feature parity — LinkedIn publishing, targeted prospect feeds, and the product's proprietary inspiration dataset — depends on platform integrations and curated data that are nontrivial to reproduce.

Visit website
You pay

$39/mo

$468/yr

Read off the official pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off40 h to build

$60/mo3 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 2 seats.

No open-source build does this yet

Nothing published replaces this one, so a replacement starts from an empty file. Here is what it would have to cover.

What a replacement has to do

  • Create a post draft with an LLM, save/organize inspiration, schedule posts, and generate human-like replies/comments from context.

What it still won’t have

  • Native LinkedIn publishing and in-account automation (no official LinkedIn integration or automatic posting)
  • Targeted feeds with prospect tracking and relationship stage automation
  • Priority support, roadmap access, and proprietary inspiration database of 100k+ viral posts
  • Built-in browser extension and cross-platform smart-clip features

What remains hard

  • Brand trustLoved by 1,000+ creators
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 2 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal Depost-like web app using Next.js (React) + Postgres + Redis + Node worker; integrate OpenAI (or similar) for text generation. Core features in scope: user signup/login and subscription check; a rich text post editor that sends prompts to the LLM to generate/rewrite posts in a saved 'brand voice'; store bookmarks/inspiration with tags and search; a scheduler UI and background worker to mark posts as 'published' (no direct LinkedIn publishing) and run scheduled jobs; an API endpoint to generate humanized comments/replies from saved context. Out of scope: automatic publishing to LinkedIn, advanced targeted feeds/prospect tracking, and browser extension. Include error handling, rate-limit/backoff for the LLM, unit and integration tests for API endpoints, and a basic CI deployment manifest (Docker + one-click for a small VPS).
How we checked2 sources · 3/3 runs agreed · evidence score 60

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • 2 cited sources+1
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • 3/3 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Evidence score60

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 2

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page✓ 3 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat quoted from the page