Design and diagrams decision

Cloudcraft

A lightweight Cloudcraft replacement (manual diagram editor, persistence, exports) is realistic for a capable developer to build and maintain; the proprietary Live cloud-scanning, integrations, and enterprise polish are the main things you'd lose.

Visit website
You pay

$99/mo

$1,188/yr

Per seat. Read off the official pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$50one-off30 h to build

$0/mo6 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 1 seat.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Cloudcraft alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Manually create and edit cloud architecture diagrams with an AWS/Azure component palette, save/load diagrams, and export PNG/SVG.

What it still won’t have

  • Cloudcraft Live scanning that auto-generates diagrams from cloud accounts
  • 3D view and advanced visual polish
  • Built-in Datadog integration and live metric navigation to Datadog dashboards
  • Enterprise features: SSO integrations, 90-day version history, and team/enterprise management polish
  • Confluence plugin / embedding workflow and advanced collaboration tooling

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 1 seat.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal Cloudcraft-like web app using React + Konva (canvas/SVG) for the frontend, Node.js + Express + Postgres for the backend, and S3-compatible storage for exported assets. In scope: a drag-and-drop palette with common AWS and Azure SVG icons and ability to add custom icons; canvas with pan/zoom, connectable components, save/load diagrams as JSON; PNG and SVG export; user accounts (email/password) and shareable read-only diagram links; server-side persistence and CI tests. Out of scope: automatic cloud account scanning (Live), Datadog integration, 3D rendering, enterprise SSO, and multi-team admin controls. Include robust error handling, input validation, and unit + integration tests for API endpoints and export logic.
How we checked4 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 89

How the score was reached

  • Build verdict base78
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 4 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • Evidence score89

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 4

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded